Wikipedia:Peer review/So Seductive/archive1

So Seductive
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I've done extensive work on it, and I feel it could be GA worthy soon. Please be honest with criticism, as I don't mind if it makes the article better.

Thanks for your time! I Am Rufus  &bull;  Conversation is a beautiful thing.  10:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll do this. --Noleander (talk) 14:54, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments from Noleander End Noleander comments. --Noleander (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm basing this PR on the GA criteria at Good article criteria
 * If possible, 1 or 2 pics should be added. If none are not available, that is okay.
 * Past tense: "and is produced by record producer Punch," - I think "was produced" is better.
 * Overall the prose looks fine ... I'm not seeing any big issues.  For GA recognition, I think it is adequate.
 * The citations are more than adequate, so the Verifiability requirement is met.
 * I don't see any bias in the article, so the NPOV requirement is met.
 * No edit wars are in progress. so that is not a problem.
 * Lead looks good.
 * Conclusion: It appears to meet all the GA criteria.  I suggest that you nominate it at WP:GAN.  It looks like it will have, at most, a few minor prose issues to resolve.

Having fixed the issues you have stated, I think I will put it to WP:GAN. Thank you for your time! I Am Rufus  &bull;  Conversation is a beautiful thing.  15:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)