Wikipedia:Peer review/Sorcerer (film)/archive2

Sorcerer (film)
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I think I have improved it considerably and tremendously since it was last peer-reviewed, and I think its scope is adequate to warrant Good / Featured article and the latter is my goal. However, I believe some copy-editing, table of contents modification and unification of reference could be done to ensure maximum level of adherence to wikipedia standards.
 * Previous peer review

Thanks, Salt The Fries 86 (talk) 09:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Impressive article. But if you want suggestions:
 * Maybe the citation can be split between "References" and "Bibliography" (example), with extensive usage of page citing templates reduce the repetition of refs and usage of page numbers on the article body.
 * Why is Design a separate section from Production, when it could be a subsection?
 * Wonder if you can put a regular source instead of Cracked, despite that unlike later articles that one doesn't tell where the content comes from.
 * The images have no alt text.

igordebraga ≠ 02:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)