Wikipedia:Peer review/South Park/archive1

South Park
I have contributed to this article majorly, as have other contributors, and I think it is high time it attained featured status. It is well written, and I believe most issues have been resolved. There are some minor disputes, but, through peer review, it is sure to achieve perfection and be selected.--Orthologist 15:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe it requires a lot more references, and those which already exist require proper citation templates. The "Recurring themes" is made nearly entirely out of original research.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   15:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with the citation templates, but I've found some reliable sites that include half of the information in the "Recurring Themes" section. I've placed them at the end of the External Links section.--Orthologist 18:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Read this Buc 22:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid to say that you're far away from FA status. There are too few citations, too much about characters, even for such a long-running show, and nothing (apparent) about critical reception. Might I suggest you take a gander at Excel Saga for an example of FA TV articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monocrat (talk • contribs) 05:28, March 7, 2007 (UTC)