Wikipedia:Peer review/Spot croaker/archive1

Spot croaker
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because i want to make it a GA article and i wanted to get some feedback before I put it up for GA

Thanks, Dmanrulz180 (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

I hope these comments are useful. When you address them let me know at my talk page if you'd like for me to take another look or to ask me a question there. I won't have this peer review on my watchlist. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 08:11, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Some comments
 * Anything in the WP:LEAD should already be mentioned in the article
 * The phrase "excellent table fare" may not be understandable to all English readers. Its palatability should also be sourced.
 * Move the bit about the NC into a "Society and culture" section, perhaps. Ideally a WP:SECONDARY source is best for analysis and detail of the event.
 * The article's title should be bolded (WP:BOLDTITLE)
 * The common name should also be bolded in the first sentence
 * I don't know why Spot should be capitalized. I see brook trout is not, and there is this for guidance CAPITAL
 * "frequently caught by recreational anglers" is a vague/generic statement that may be best removed or sourced
 * detritus is mentioned in the lead, but not the body of the article for example