Wikipedia:Peer review/Spy vs Spy (Australian band)/archive1

Spy vs Spy (Australian band)

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for November 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for November 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because it has been rewritten from scratch to remove COI issues.

Thanks, McWomble (talk) 05:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Ruhrfisch comments: Interesting article, not sure what the COI was before. Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 05:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Article needs a copyedit - just from the lead Initial line-up included the trio Craig Bloxom on bass guitar/lead vocals, Cliff Grigg on drums/percussion and Mike Weiley on lead guitar/vocals.[1][2] could be something like The initial line-up was a trio which included Craig Bloxom on bass guitar/lead vocals, Cliff Grigg on drums/percussion and Mike Weiley on lead guitar/vocals.[1][2]
 * Any chance for some images? Perhaps a publicity shot or album cover as fair use?
 * Article needs more references, for example the last paragraph in the Regroupings: 1991–current section has no refs. The popularity in Brazil material is also unreferenced. My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a ref.
 * I would split out the discography as a separate article. See WP:Summary Style
 * There are several places where dates / years could be added to provide context to the reader - see WP:PCR