Wikipedia:Peer review/Stephen Short/archive1

Stephen Short

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I came across this page and noticed that it is written as an autobiography and seems to be very... slanted towards whoever wrote it. By looking at the |history one can tell that User:ManbirS has some relation to this person, and his edit history is deeply suspicious of promotional activity.

That's not to say promotional activity is entirely bad; They do work that adds to the encyclopedia, but it seems to be the information being added isn't exactly unbiased.

That is why I am flagging this article for a PR.

Thanks, Jeff (talk) 04:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry, but this meets the Peer review/Request removal policy, specifically ''Requests that aren't appropriate for peer review, for instance requests for help in containing vandalism, resolving an edit war, or detecting a copyvio. These should be removed promptly in the interest of the requester, since he/she is unlikely to get adequate response to them at Peer Review. Please drop a note on the requester's talk page to inform them of the removal and the reasons for it, and try to recommend a better page to list the request...''. If the listing at the SPAM noticeboard does not work, please consider the conflict of interest noticeboard: WP:COI/N. Thanks and sorry, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 02:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)