Wikipedia:Peer review/Stormfront (website)/archive1

Stormfront (website)
In general how can the article be improved? In between here and FAC, what needs to happen? --Alecmconroy 17:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * A few points:
 * 1) Your lead paragraph is only one densely written paragraph. FACs should have three summing up the entire article.
 * 2) The history section jumps from 1997 to 2006: what happened in that time?
 * 3) The references, while good, do not have authors. There are also not enough of them; some sentences make bold assertions without any links to back them up. Example, "Critics accuse Stormfront members of supporting violence, genocide, and ethnic cleansing."
 * 4) You may want to expand the article, which is too short, by mentioning reaction to Stormfront, in favour of them: any neonazi organisations promote or affiliate to it? You can then spin this, along with mootstormfront into a "reaction" section, rather than keeping it in controversy and criticism.

That's all I can think at the moment. Good luck! Dev920 19:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)