Wikipedia:Peer review/Streetlight Manifesto/archive2

Streetlight Manifesto
Old Peer Review: Peer review/Streetlight Manifesto/archive1.

I feel I have addressed the issues raised in the first peer review and that the article is much the stronger for it. I am now submitting it for a second peer review, this time with the goal of hopefully taking it to FAC. &mdash; Ian Moody (talk) 14:01, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * You might want to add a band infobox, and move the current/future events template to the top of the article. My general thought is that the article hasn't got a lot of context - each section seems to be a paragraph, isn't there any information missing that could be added? Looking good so far, has potential as a featured article candidate. — Wackymacs 19:16, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I've added the band infobox, and also removed the future template entirely as I wasn't all that happy with it to begin with, particularly since it added the article to Category:Future events, which I don't think is a good place for it. Don't really know how I could improve the context though.  As for missing information, I could include information about the Keasbey Nights 2 debacle, and also mention the repeated delays Streetlight and Tomas are somewhat known for. &mdash; Ian Moody (talk) 19:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)