Wikipedia:Peer review/Suspensory muscle of duodenum/archive1

Suspensory muscle of duodenum
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like some feedback as to how to improve this article to GA status. Some areas I've identified include:
 * Lack of proper citations.

I'd value some feedback.

Thanks, LT910001 (talk) 00:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I just had a quick look at the article:
 * A good explanation of why it is referred to as either a ligament or a muscle (I feel very strongly about this, since it nearly drove me mad when I started with anatomy). ✅
 * Inclusion of these alternative names in lead if there are any more; suspensory ligament of duodenum perhaps??? (An if there are any; redirects from these names are also good... it won´t help with GA status, but still...) ✅

Best of luck with the undertaking. Kind regards JakobSteenberg (talk) 10:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your feedback! I can't promise this'll be included tomorrow, but it will before the nomination... LT910001 (talk) 09:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Ping to. Hello, GrahamColm, It's a pity our paths haven't crossed before. I heard you described as a "poop doctor" on WikiMed (an auspicious title, to be sure!) and assume that means gastroenterologist. I'm planning on getting to work on this article soon. In order to reach GA, excluding the issue with citations and finding an in vivo extra image, do you have any suggestions as to what would constitute adequate broadness? LT910001 (talk) 02:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually I'm a virologist. This does not exclude me from this peer review of course, but lack of time does. Graham Colm (talk) 06:40, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah. No worries then. Am closing review. LT910001 (talk) 06:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)