Wikipedia:Peer review/Sweden/archive1

Sweden
This article is currently a "good article" (Good articles). While it does change a lot and the quality of individual sections may vary greatly, I'm hoping that someone who knows about writing featured country article could give some feedback on what major work that needs to be done. For instance, is it important to adhere to WikiProject Countries ? More references? Important sections have major omissions? Lots of redundant information?

There have been no POV disputed, but oviously everyone have their own view of what should be mentioned in the lead or be put in prominent sections. So please don't just give opinions in the form of "I would like [hard rock / neutrality during world war II, etc] to be mentioned..."

Apart from that, any comments are welcome.

Fred-Chess 12:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

–Gustavb 07:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * A section about the Swedish Military would be good.
 * There's a red "Main article" link under the section Religion in Sweden.
 * Some data need references, e.g. the numbers under Largest cities and Politics.
 * The saturation-level of the "Gripsholms Castle" picture is way too high, the picture should be replaced with a better one.
 * I would like C.M. Bellman (and maybe E. Taube) to be mentioned in the music section&hellip; (sorry, just had to).


 * Thank you for your comments!
 * The issues you mention are rather minor. I know very well how they can be addressed so I don't except that to take very long to fix (tomorrow, June 6, would be appropriate, no?).
 * Evert Taube has a small article and is hardly known outside of Sweden (as far as I know), as a sort of reference, the article Evert Taube has six interwikilinks while, say, In Flames has thirteen. Do you still think that Evert should still be pointed out? I am asking -- because it is my impression that article should present that which might be of interest for the general English speaker.
 * There are many other questions I am not sure of, for instance what images should be on the article? There are quite a lot now, maybe it is too many, or maybe they are not specific enough? What is the ideal look of a country article?
 * Fred-Chess 16:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)