Wikipedia:Peer review/Table of political parties in Europe by pancontinental organisation/archive1

Table of political parties in Europe by pancontinental organisation
Self-nom, at the urging of others. Ultimate plan is to head for Featured list status, but could do with some input before I head thatwaywards. The Tom 22:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The article is too short. Most of the page is taken up by the massive table. The title of the article is spelled wrong...:-P. It could do with a strong input by other.Nominaladversary 22:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Nice table. You could perhaps link the many word found for some of the countries to the relevant 'Politics of' for that country (or list of parties page for that country if it exists). For example: Politics_of_Armenia CheekyMonkey 13:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Big table. Look at it with different screen resolutions and browser text sizes. It does not fit on the screen in some settings (including mine). Width must be set to 100% or <600px. Also, expand the intro to discuss what being a pancontinental organisation means to a political party. What is the point of being pancontinental? Advantages/disadvantages? Also, references are a requirement for featured status. Perhaps a simple link to each party's website will be adequate. If the references get too long try formatting it as a paralell list like Kerala. --maclean 25  10:22, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This is very informative, but the table is just way too large. I would suggest this data needs to be broken down by region, and displayed in a series of tables with countries along the top side and the pancontinental organizations running on the left side.--Pharos 13:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * That breaks the left-right effect, and eliminates the ability of someone to quickly scan to see what the "equivalent" party is between country x and country y The Tom 16:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)