Wikipedia:Peer review/Tactical level/archive1

tactical level
First attempt to create a wikipedia entry needs feedback. Daniel.wengelin 14:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Needs sources and more information. As of now it's basically just the definition.  Perhaps think about expanding the article a little bit, I don't know exactly how much can be covered her.  But definitely provide sources.  --MateoP 15:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * In addition to the above, I suggest giving more background on "tactical units or task forces" (probably examples), giving examples of what actions (deployment, maybe?) would be decided at the tactical level, and what kinds of officers (generals? colonels?) are responsible for tactical level decisions. Also, it would be good to have a few examples of conflicts in which tactical level decisions made a significant difference. Deltabeignet 03:11, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I really don't see the merit of a separate entry. Military tactic is tiny and this could be elaborated there or perhaps in just tactics. The official military status of a term doesn't automatically qualify it as an encyclopedic concept. Not even if it's American. :-p
 * Peter Isotalo 12:47, 26 December 2005 (UTC)