Wikipedia:Peer review/Tea Peter/archive1

Tea Peter
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I hope to make this article a good article. I worked on this and tried to expand it as much as I could. Maybe this article's "reception" section needs working on, and also maybe its prose.

Thanks, Koopatrev (talk) 02:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: I've not read the article, but I noticed the external links section was missing. This typically includes at least the IMDB and TV.com links. See Portal:Family Guy for other featured and good articles. -- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 20:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * also for You Can't Do That on Television, Peter, Leggo My Meg-O and Mr. and Mrs. Stewie Koopatrev (talk) 03:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments The Rambling Man (talk) 16:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Infobox, you have a mix of capitalised and uncapitalised "Girl" and "Silhouette".
 * Koopatrev (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "twenty first" is usually hyphenated.
 * Koopatrev (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "It received mixed to negative reviews from critics for its storyline and cultural references. It was viewed by 4.94 million viewers, according to Nielsen ratings" I'd say something like, "Viewed by ..., it received mixed to negative..."
 * I have to say "according to nielsen ratings" after giving the amount of viewers, so I don't think I know how to reword the whole thing Koopatrev (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "Julius Sharpe" is mentioned in the lead as a guest actor but not in the infobox.
 * Koopatrev (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You also call them guest "actor" in the infobox, and guest "star" in the lead. Be consistent.
 * Koopatrev (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "finds he is unsympathetic" just "finds him" is fine.
 * Koopatrev (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "The episode was..." new section, re-iterate "Tea Peter" was...
 * Three short paras in the Prod/cult. refs section, expand or merge.
 * "acquired a 2.4/6 rating share" I'm not sure what this means.
 * Koopatrev (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "Carter Doston of TV Fanatic gave a 2.7/5 rating." neither the reviewer nor the publication have an article here, why should I care what he thinks?
 * Well we need to have more than one review, it's to provide different opinions. But I guess it's still notable Koopatrev (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You don't need the succession box at the bottom because you have that info in the infobox.
 * Koopatrev (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Koopatrev (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)