Wikipedia:Peer review/Tech Tower/archive1

Tech Tower
This article is already a Good Article. What does it need in order to be near or at FA quality? —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 02:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Merzbow (comments)

Great article, it's very close to FA quality in my book. - Merzbow 06:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I made some minor hopefully non-controversial copyedits.
 * A number of paragraphs in this article don't have or end in inline citations; they need them.
 * "an historical" -> "a historical" because "historical" begins with a consonant-type sound. (I had to look this up).
 * I found one caption which I think needs to end in a period, and changed it, but now I'm not sure. Anyone more experienced with WP:CAP want to comment? Which of these captions are complete sentences?
 * Should "technological education" be "technology education" or somesuch?
 * One women gave over $340 million? Wow. The reference backs this up, but this sounds like a fantastic figure.
 * Should instances of 'T' be "T" instead? I can't find the style rule here, but there must be one. (There are one or two places where T is bare also).
 * "Modern usage" -> "Modern use" in that section heading.