Wikipedia:Peer review/The Lion King/archive5

The Lion King
This peer review discussion has been closed. Just how far away from GA is this page on the 1994 Disney classic? (I'll give it a shot soon thanks to LexisNexis and what not.)
 * Previous peer review

Thanks, Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 16:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments from Jappalang

Answering your very first question, there is still far to go. This article uses several sources of questionable reliability. How do Kimbawlion.com, UltimateDisney.com, Hans-Zimmer.com. eeggs.com, lionking.org, and tv.com qualify as reliable sources per Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-26/Dispatches and Wikipedia Signpost/2008-07-28/Dispatches? Alleging "One similarity is the protagonists' names: Kimba and Simba" is original research (basically, no reliable source states this comparison). File:Kimbasimba.JPG fails WP:NFCC; it has no detailed fair use rationale to explain why it should qualify, the use of it is only to support a simple sentence that does not explicitly refer to the scenes and is cited to an unreliable source. File:Lionkg2.jpg also requires a more specific fair use rationale. Cast, Sequels and spin-offs, and Impact on popular culture are such short sections or are lacking in any substantial content that they would be better off removed or integrated into other sections. Jappalang (talk) 07:12, 13 October 2010 (UTC)