Wikipedia:Peer review/The Soxaholix/archive1

The Soxaholix

 * This is my first article from scratch and so I'd like to see what I can do better in creating new articles. General comments and suggestions for reaching GA status will be very appreciated.  Thanks.  ju66l3r 18:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I think GA isn't that far away. But the "Characters" section needs a total rewrite in the light of WP:WAF (I've tagged it accordingly). Sandstein 22:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks. I hadn't even thought to be aware for something like that in creating the article.  If someone is skilled about out-of-universe conversion, I'd love some help on the section; otherwise, I'll take a crack at it myself.  ju66l3r 22:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The article doesn't appear to use any reliable sources, uses blogs as sources, and the first source listed - the Soxaholix website - appears to be a blatant copyvio (Wall Street Journal), which means the Soxaholix site shouldn't be listed anywhere on Wikipedia (it violates copyright). See WP:EL.  Sandy 13:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The Wall Street Journal is not a reliable source? If the article's reference was simply to the WSJ "buy this article now" because it is subscription access only, would that be better?  Or better yet, the citation could be plaintext and simply reference the issue and page number and force someone to go find a copy themselves?  It's also difficult to understand the copyvio since only a link to the article and not the text was used here.  The only blog used as a source is Deadspin (notable in its own right to have a wiki-article); the remaining sources are all independent (and in most cases, notable) awards for online sites.  As for your contention that WP:EL demands Soxaholix shouldn't be listed, I can not find that passage anywhere within EL, can you please help me find it?  I have spoken with the author of the Soxaholix website and referenced the Wall Street Journal article in our discussions and it did not seem to be an issue for him to have it on his website, therefore according to WP:COPY, there should not be a problem since I can assume there is no copyright conflict.  From WP:COPY:  "Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page in question is not violating someone else's copyright."  I believe that to be the case, but as I said above, the link can be moved from the pdf to the WSJ "buy this article" page or simple reference to the article.  ju66l3r 14:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I have moved the link to the WSJ.com site and added the original publication date and page number for someone to look it up for themselves in microfilm/archive if they can not view the subscription-required page. I believe that's in line with Wikipedia policy for not linking to what you deemed to be copyright violation.  I have also renewed contact with the website's owner as per above.  ju66l3r 15:02, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * My final comment on this matter unless there is discussion: I have an e-mail from the site owner stating that the author of the WSJ article gave him explicit permission to post the PDF for others to read from the Soxaholix website.  He also told me that in an upcoming website redesign that is planned, he will be removing that PDF in any case (alleviating any concern that soxaholix.com is not allowed external linkage in your mind.  ju66l3r 16:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest further checking into the exact wording of WSJ's copyright. I don't believe an e-mail from the site owner does it:  I think you may need an e-mail from the WSJ.  But I'm in over my head on that.  If you want the article to attain FA, you may need to figure out where/who to run this by on Wiki:  I haven't been able to figure out all the various copyvio fora on Wiki, but the last time I looked for them, everything I found had outrageous backlogs.  One thing you might to in the meantime is just link to the WSJ for a fee URL, and then include only the relevant text which validates your inline citation as part of the inline citation.  Good luck !  Sandy 18:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Forgot to add the relevant text from WP:EL: "Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page is not violating copyright per contributors' rights and obligations. Knowingly and intentionally directing others to a site that violates copyright has been considered a form of contributory infringement in the United States. "  Sandy 18:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I have now taken care of the link problem and also taken care of the in/out-of-universe perspective problem in the Characters section. If there are any other thoughts on this article, they'll be appreciated.  Otherwise, I'll be submitting a nomination for this article to receive GA status soon.  ju66l3r 18:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 15:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Done. Thanks for running the script on my article.  ju66l3r 02:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)