Wikipedia:Peer review/Third fundamental form/archive1

Third fundamental form
I've listed this article for peer review because the article was recently created and its author requested a peer review in the talk page.

Thanks, Mecanismo | Talk 17:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Right now it isn't useful because the content is beyond the knowledge level of the vast majority of readers. I'd suggest that the author take a look at WP:TECHNICAL and WP:CITE. Praemonitus (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)