Wikipedia:Peer review/Thirteen (Megadeth album)/archive2

Thirteen (Megadeth album)
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I want this article to become a featured article. Presently, I know the article has potential, but I need some help ironing out the rough edges.
 * Previous peer review

Thanks, L1A1 FAL (talk) 13:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments by Crisco 1492

 * Lead could use information about the composition process (recording, conception, etc)
 * Done Added some information about songs, that some of the songs were reworked things from the past and that it was recorded in 2011. Anything else takes away from the rest of the article, in my opinion.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 22:18, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The section #Odd occurrences during recording could be retitled
 * Done I just removed the header. Isn't really necessary anyway--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The section #Songs looks really choppy when passing through. It could be broken up into subsections
 * In Progress--L1A1 FAL (talk) 22:18, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * revealed the band had already started "talking about [a new album]" and explained that, although the band was in "tour mode", there were a "couple of ideas" the band was starting to work on. - a little verbose. I think this could probably be cut back a bit without losing any information
 * Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Following the successful European "big four" concerts, Drover stated plans for recording a thirteenth Megadeth album. - What does this add that the preceding sentence doesn't?
 * DoneThis is why PR is such a good thing; other sets of eyes catch things I missed. Removed the offending sentence.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * There's actually a lot of that going on. I don't seem to have the time to pick at every sentence, but here are some general hints
 * Rather than phrasing everything as a "revelation" or announcement, instead present it as fact (except where changed subsequently). "In an interview before a show in Auckland, New Zealand, Mustaine noted that the then-upcoming record was the last one on his contract with Roadrunner Records and mentioned that Roadrunner was trying to give the band a "huge new deal". However, Mustaine expressed frustration with the label, saying "The treatment's been terrible over the years, and I just don't want it." He stated that he would prefer to retire than "continue to play like that". Nevertheless, Mustaine exclaimed the band's new record would be "great" and the songs were "really good". for instance, is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too verbose. Something like "Thirteen was the last album completed by Megadeth as part of their (x-album maybe?) contract with Roadrunner Records. Mustained explained that, although the label was trying to give the band a "huge new deal", he (or the band?) had grown tired of the company's poor treatment and would rather retire than "continue to play like that"." The last sentence (about the "great" album) is ultimately just pre-album hype, and not encyclopedic. That he said this in an interview is not necessary to note explicitly if we're not quoting him as much. That would mean turning 91 words into about 52 words... and be a much tighter read. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Noted. I don't have time right at this moment, but I will start addressing these critiques shortly. Thanks for your input!--L1A1 FAL (talk) 01:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments by Wehwalt

 * Lede
 * It strikes me that the second and third sentences of the lede paragraph can be combined.
 * Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 13:41, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I would date the release of the lead single, since you make reference to that time later on.
 * Is the detail on the Grammy nominations for the singles really necessary, given that none won?
 * Done I trimmed the fat somewhat, but I feel that it is given due weight in the lead by mentioning them as it's written now. It was a little too detailed before though.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 13:47, 20 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Writing, etc.
 * "drummer Shawn Drover revealed the band talking about a followup album " some rephrasing may be needed here.
 * DoneI think I rephrased that before and must have left a word out when I did. Decided to rewrite it a little more now.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Mustaine should be introduced at first mention, say as "frontman" or "lead singer"
 * Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "Was it Mustaine's contract about to expire or the band's? " I realize that it can be just about the same thing
 * Done fixed--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "but clarified the band would not be hitting the studio until 2011. " Hardly surprising, given it was a December interview.
 * "Ellefson stated the album was ready to be mixed as of July 2011." You should probably lead off with the date "By July 2011, the album was ready to be mixed". I don't know if you really need to source it to Ellefson.  Is no detail available on the recording sessions? Even when they were? Do the liner notes say anything on the subject?
 * Countdown to Extinction should be italicized in the quotation.
 * Fixed--L1A1 FAL (talk) 12:58, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * " Ellefson also announced the band has been considering album titles, but no release date was yet planned." Two issues here. First, why the "has been" about past events?  And this seems contradictory to Mustaine's statement about the title, although that did say "subsequently". Straighten out, please. Also, you mention the inclusion of "Sudden Death" and "Already Dead" twice each, plus even more info in the "songs" section.
 * The two previous examples of Megadeth songs being contributed to video games can probably be consigned to a footnote.
 * "It was clarified a day later on the band's website to be "Th1rt3en"" Possibly "The band revealed a day later on its website that the title of the album would be rendered, "Th1rt3en"
 * Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 12:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * ""À Tout le Monde": What relevance does this have to Thirteen?
 * tried to make it a little more clear that it is the reason why Mustaine was concerned about the release date being a bad omen--L1A1 FAL (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Release etc.
 * Put footnote strings in numerical order
 * Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live! is not only mentioned twice but it is linked twice. Consolidate please.
 * Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Songs
 * The Grammy noms should be sourced and should probably appear under "Reaction" or a similar section
 * Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Why is Ellefson's comment in the present tense when most other band quotations are in the past?
 * Done If you are referring to where it said "Ellefson also notes", then that's been fixed.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Reaction
 * Do we really need to hear about Mustaine's "snarling" vocals THREE TIMES? Find some other stuff they said.
 * Done--L1A1 FAL (talk) 13:41, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "disappointed of" disappointed by
 * DoneYeah, that must have been edited down from something else and that was overlooked. Fixed now, thanks for catching it!--L1A1 FAL (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Did the band tour in support of the album?
 * My general thought is that greater thought should be given to how information is organized and presented so as to avoid repetitions and what seems sometimes to be somewhat of a random ordering of information.
 * I'll be happy to follow up and read it again, just drop me a note on my talk. --Wehwalt (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Noted. I will look over these more carefully and act on them soon. Thanks for your input!--L1A1 FAL (talk) 15:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments by Retrohead

 * Megadeth's release Endgame would be better described as "the previous album"; also, do we need to quote "couple of ideas"?
 * American rock producer "Johnny K" Karkazis→I think the nationality and music genre might be a bit too detailed for an article such as this; also, why don't we write the producer simply as Johnny K, per his Wiki article?
 * Done I'm gonna have to scan through he rest of the article though to make sure he's not referred to by his last name elsewhere though.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * instead of Andy Sneap
 * Noted Did something else with the sentence instead that I think works.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * If tracks "Sudden Death" and "Never Dead" were previously released, it should be stated when and where. This should read chronologically, and I saw they were discussed few paragraphs bellow.
 * album names should be capitalized even if they appear in quote marks (check Endgame and Countdown to Extinction)
 * Do you mean italicized? I didn't see any caps issues, but both were in some instances not italicized. I think one of the other editors pointed that out too. In any case, that is fixed.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * the 'Songs' section could be re-shaped so that song descriptions appear per track listing.