Wikipedia:Peer review/TimidObserver/Jay Busbee/archiveN

TimidObserver/Jay Busbee
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because i've never submitted an article for Wikipedia before and am unsure of wheather or not the article in its current format meets the standards of a proper Wikipedia page. I am more than sure that the subject more than respects the notability aspect. I am not sure though if I added sections to the page properly or enough proper sections. Some things may require their own section, I don't know. All I know is this person is important enough to need documenting on Wikipedia. Any edits anyone wants to suggest is desired. Thank you in advance for your time and patience.
 * Previous peer review

TimidObserver (talk) 05:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Peer review only works for articles in article space, not in user space (which is why there are all of the red links up there). Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 02:31, 17 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I am archiving this as the page in question has been speedily deleted. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 13:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)