Wikipedia:Peer review/Triceratops/archive1

Triceratops
Hi, this article is scrubbing up OK on its way to FAC. We worked on Stegosaurus and Diplodocus, both of which are now Featured Articles. Anyone see some other issues before having a tilt at FAC? cheers Cas Liber 10:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Some issues at hand:


 * header: ...collected for over a century can it simply include what century?
 * (OK, rewritten that one to sound less vague)


 * POV: Triceratops is the best known... (statement unsourced).


 * "this beak may also be have been used in self-defense." (unsourced) speculative in nature.


 * links: not linked, red links and articles for creation: 1990, 1970, 1993, 1922, Juvenile, T. horridus, T. prorsus, T. brevicornus, T. elatus, T. calicornis, T. obtusus, T. hatcheri, Bruce Erickson, Lancian faunal stage,  etc.
 * (I've created stubs for Rudolph Zallinger (solved a few redlinks that one :)), Schlaikjer and Erickson - the individual Triceratops species prbably shouldn't have them. Will go down the page. Time for breakfast now...)


 * use of comma
 * (commas are generally considered better to use thn parentheses, however it does cause confusion sometimes. I'll try and split or tweak a few sentences)


 * typo error


 * "Triceratops is also the official state fossil of South Dakota, and the official state dinosaur of Wyoming"; "It is a common pop culture dinosaur" (unsourced).
 * (thanks for pointing out that sentence, I have rewritten it - as far as it being unsourced, I figured the length of the pop culture refs would be self-explanatory in highlighting its commonness in use)


 * i'm not sure if there's a common english use for the term: Triceratops to merit the italics format. if there's none, i'm not sure if it should be so, please correct me if i'm wrong. --RebSkii 19:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * (As they are scientific names, the standard practice on all the dino pages has been italics)


 * (PS: Thanks for all the input - gittin' there...............) Cas Liber 21:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 21:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)