Wikipedia:Peer review/Twin/archive1

Twin / Multiple birth
I've reworked the twin article adding lots of things and bringing in information from identical twin (which I now think should just be a redirect). It may even be worth merging twin into multiple birth. I think this could work its way towards being a featured article but I'm pretty much out of things I can think of adding. Would appreciate any comments, additions or changes. violet/riga (t) 18:41, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * I've made a few changes to twin (as you will have seen). Although twin is a special case of multiple birth, I think the two articles can sensibly be kept separate. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:01, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I noticed - thanks! My reasoning for placing twin into multiple birth was such that there may well be a large section of information duplicated between the two articles.  The latter is quite small compared and perhaps just needs more work itself. violet/riga (t) 16:24, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)