Wikipedia:Peer review/Uncharted 2: Among Thieves/archive1

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because It really has chances to become FA.

Thanks, Taro James (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Ruhrfisch comments: Thanks for your work on this interesting article. I think it would need a fair amount of work before it would stand a chance at WP:FAC, so here are some suggestions for improvement, with FAC in mind. Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The biggest problem this would face at FAC is a lack of references. My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a ref.
 * Some of the refs are bare URLs, and/or do not have all the information needed. Internet refs need URL, title, author if known, publisher and date accessed. cite web and other cite templates may be helpful. See WP:CITE and WP:V
 * The External links tool in the Toolbox on this page finds multiple dead links and others that are potential problems - these would need to be fixed before FAC
 * It is useful to have a model article for ideas and examples to follow - New Super Mario Bros. is a recent FA and may be a useful model
 * The lead seems like it could be expanded per WP:LEAD
 * The lead should be an accessible and inviting overview of the whole article. Nothing important should be in the lead only - since it is a summary, it should all be repeated in the body of the article itself.
 * My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way, but this seems too short to do that - probably needs at least one more paragraph
 * The article has a fair number of short (one or two sentence) paragraphs and sections which interrupt the flow. These should be combined with others or perhaps expanded in almost all cases
 * There is one disambiguation link that needs to be fixed - see here
 * Please make sure that the existing text includes no copyright violations, plagiarism, or close paraphrasing. For more information on this please see Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches. (This is a general warning given in all peer reviews, in view of previous problems that have risen over copyvios.)