Wikipedia:Peer review/Undertale/archive1

Undertale


I've listed this article for peer review because I want to bring it to FA status. Expecting a TFA on the game's tenth anniversary.

Thanks, lunaeclipse  (talk)  12:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Welp, I literally had that same idea too! Here are some things that I'm pretty sure should be done before a FAC.
 * Comments from Skyshifter
 * Undertale has been studied in multiple scholarly sources. Adding them is necessary for a comprehensive article. It's possible that a "Themes" section can be created.
 * The Reception section seems lacking, for a game that received so much attention — in fact, I originally planned to rewrite this section. More reviews and aspects of the game can be added here.
 * "Impact and legacy" can likely be expanded to include Undertale influence in other games. Some retrospective Undertale articles (i.e. "Undertale was released 5 years ago" etc.) could probably be added here. "Fandom" could likely be expanded too — in fact, I think an Undertale fandom article is feasible.

Skyshifter  talk  13:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Comments from BP!
 * Game Rant sources are low-quality sources that should be omitted.
 * Italicize game and film titles in the citation titles per MOS:CONFORMTITLE (this was brought up at Peer review/Ada Wong/archive1).
 * Works/websites/magazines should be all linked at citations
 * Italicize the works/websites/magazines since some of them aren't yet, like IGN.
 * If some citations don't have an author, just simply remove the "staff" as an author since it's irrelevant.
 * Several citations don't have authors. 🍕 Boneless Pizza! 🍕 (🔔) 12:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)