Wikipedia:Peer review/Walt Disney World International Program/archive1

Walt Disney World International Program
It has been suggested that this article could be cleaned up and/or restructured. Personally, I think it looks ok if a bit bland. The information seems to be all accurate... I'm working towards submitting this page as a FA candidate. KC. 04:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't know how to fix this, but the article is nearly all lists. Unless you're going to put it up for WP:FLC, it doesn't have enough prose to be considered a FA. Surely the qualifications section, and the small list about eligibility under Current programs could be turned into prose. That's the most glaring problem with this being a FAC. Harro5 23:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Yup! That's just about exactly what I was looking for! I've begun a major rewrite and edit-with 3 sections so far done (everything up to International COllege Program) with more to come in the next 2 days. Any further input you have will be much apprectiated. Thanks for your input so far, Harro5! KC. 04:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Also, just looking now, don't you think the headings need a re-work? Particularly the subheadings - these are very long by Wikipedia standards - and most headings aren't capitalised properly per the WP:MOS (only caps for first word and proper nouns). I'd try to make them shorter, or just merge these sub-sections to leave just Level2 headings if possible. Again, the more prose, the easier that fluidity becomes. Good luck with the major edit promised on the page. Harro5 09:46, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Even after the re-write, both my comments are yet to be addressed. Also, you need to use the old and  system for inline citations. Harro5 00:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Erm, Firstly, I took out the level 3 subheadings and merged it to level 2 subheadings only. I shortened the subheadings names and capitalised them properly... Cultural Representative Program and International College Program were left in all capitals as they are proper nouns. I'll see what I can do with regards to note and ref tagging. KC. 17:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

I've just finished the rewrite (I think...). Let me know what you think! KC. 16:47, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well it still seems listy to me, this could have potential as a featured list candidate. — Wackymacs 19:31, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * If you take a look at the history of the article, it was originally just titles with little prose. It's since had a huge amount of prose added to it. Still, any comments on how it could be improved upon with regards to making it less listy? KC. 20:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Fixed some spelling errors.--Esprit15d 14:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Added some images. Thoughts? KC. 03:25, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Took a look, its amazing what a little time and work will do. Both this and the WDWCP are very complex programs, ergo there is going to be alot of information and lists are unavoidable. I really think it has FA potential. When you are done on the IP, come over to the CP page and work some magic.Shifter55 06:12, 28 December 2005 (UTC)