Wikipedia:Peer review/Woodstock/archive1

Woodstock Festival
Alas, I was too little to attend Woodstock back in 1969, and needed to rely on secondary sources for my copious recent edits to the article. Any Woodstock alumni/alumnae out here — or other folks around here — who could check this article for accuracy's sake and otherwise? Anyone up to the groovy challenge here, go for it! —Peace, Catdude 00:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * CITE the references used per WP:CITE. PDXblazers 01:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Much merit in that, PDXblazers. Due to what's on my plate right now, it will regrettably take me a little time to tackle your suggestion, but I'm game to it as soon as I have more available time :)  (It would have been better as well if I had kept a log of where I found information :-) )  Thanks!!  —Catdude 02:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * ALSO Get rid of the short trivia section, such a section is unencyclopedic. PDXblazers 04:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Some quick notes:
 * The word "The" should not appear in the beginning of a heading per WP:MOS (example: The festival -> Festival)
 * Please expand the WP:LEAD to conform to guidelines (at least 2 paragraphs)
 * References and inline citations would be helpful. Ideally each section should have at least one footnote.
 * Please use the &amp;nbsp; (no-break space) between numbers and their units of measure, per WP:MOSNUM.
 * Years without full dates generally aren't linked, per WP:CONTEXT.
 * The last couple of prose sections could use expansion
 * Trivia needs to go; incorporate or remove it.
 * The rest of the article is too list-weighty, and more of the lists should be prose-ified (converted to paragraph form). Thanks, AndyZ t 23:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)