Wikipedia:Peer review/Yttrium/archive1

Yttrium

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review just before FAC to verify what MOS and c/e issues might exist, and weather the language used is accessible enough for the general audience. Nergaal (talk) 01:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Nergaal (talk) 01:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Sjc196 comments:
 * I have gone through and done some minor copy editing to the language.
 * The citations need to be sorted out to conform to Wikipedia guidelines. There is a Wikipedia reference generator tool that can help with this. Also, when citing a reference for the second time you need the "/" in the syntax, e.g. ref name="XYZ"/.
 * Some citations are needed in the Lead (as per LEAD), particularly where the lung disease claim is made.
 * I think the paragraph in the History section beginning "In 1987, a compound of Yttrium..." is superfluous, as it is covered (in more detail) in the "Medical and exotic" Applications section.
 * "It can appear to gain a slight pink luster on exposure to light" - vague. Either it does or it does not. NB As far as I can see, the citation you provide for this statement (Hammond) does not mention this.
 * "Lunar rock samples collected during the Apollo program have a relatively high yttrium content" - this is vague, "relatively high" should be quantified.
 * Why are the yttrium-halogen and yttrium sulfide, antimonide and arsenide compounds notable? Currently they are simply mentioned almost in passing.
 * "A few yttrium compunds have the oxidation state +2 and +1" - this is a little vague ("a few"), and seems tacked-on. Some examples, and information about how/why they are interesting, could be useful.
 * "Yttrium complexes were the first examples of a d0 metallacarborane incorporating an η7-carboranyl ligand" - I don't know how accessible this will be for the layperson. It could perhaps benefit from a link to a relevant Wikipedia article about the chemistry involved, to give readers some background...?
 * I assume that your reference 33 (Audi) verifies all of the claims made in the first two paragraphs of the Isotopes section (e.g. numbers of artificial isotopes) - I can only see the abstract from the hyperlink.
 * The "Consumer" subheading in the Applications section sounds odd.
 * "Yttrium iron, aluminium, and gadolinium garnets (e.g. Y3Fe5O12 and Y3Al5O12) have important magnetic properties" - why are they important?
 * "This superconductor operated at 93 K, notable because this is above liquid nitrogen's boiling point (77.1 K)" - why is it notable that it operates above the boiling point of liquid nitrogen?
 * In general there is quite a lot of information that is simply provided as short, almost stand-alone sentences, e.g. "A few yttrium compunds have the oxidation state +2 and +1" and "YIG is also very efficient as an acoustic energy transmitter and transducer". I think these sentences would benefit - as would the article - from a little more context.

I hope that's helpful! If you need me to clarify any of the points I've made, just let me know via my talk page. Sjc196 (talk) 10:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

This is not ready for FAC yet per above and per my comments at Talk:Yttrium. Stone also wants to put some finishing touches first as well. --mav (talk) 03:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)