Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Fringed Tulip

Fringed Tulip


It seems to be FP quality to me. Image by Pharaoh Hound. It appears in Tulip, as well as my userpage.

Pros:
 * Good lighting
 * High resolution
 * Good saturation
 * Sharp focus
 * Great Picture

Cons:
 * The angle may not be very engaging
 * The focus is on the center of the flower, rather then the fringing.

Comments and criticism are welcomed (in fact, I would be grateful).

Comments:
 * Nominate and support. - Pharaoh Hound 20:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Unfortunatly the bottom part is out of focus and the color seems wierd to me for some reason. -Ravedave 03:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The bottom part is quite out of focus, and there is a distracting blue shape underneath. It's otherwise a nice photo, except that generally it seems to be convention *not* to shoot straight downwards, but rather, sideways. It just works better? Stevage 11:04, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The blue spot beneath is the vase the flower was in, would it be better if I removed it? --Pharaoh Hound 13:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Generally speaking, flower photos look better as "natural" as possible - preferably while still living ;) Probably better to just avoid vases and so forth in future photos, unless you're taking photos of flower *arrangements* or it's particularly appropriate for some reason. Stevage 08:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I would have to cut the flower to get a decent background, however these tulips are still in bloom and I may try to get a better photo. I'm sure I can figure out a way to get a good background. --Pharaoh Hound 12:30, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Seconder:

