Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Ganesh (musée d'art asiatique de Berlin).jpg

Ganesha


A nice representation of a dancing Ganesha, and the play of light and shade. Big enough. Encyclopaedic value can be evaluated by knowing the following aspects from article FA Ganesha quoting:
 * "He (Ganesha) may be portrayed standing, dancing,"
 * "Ganesha is often shown riding on or attended by a mouse or rat."
 * "The number of Ganesha's arms varies; his best-known forms have between two and sixteen arms." - eight arms here.


 * Creator:Jean-Pierre Dalbéra, uploaded by redtigerxyz


 * Nominated by: Redtigerxyz  Talk 17:22, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes, this image is encyclopedic but it is unlikely to succeed at FPC because: Hope this helps. MER-C 04:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * There's enough purple and green chromatic aberration to make me reach for my 3D glasses.
 * The shadows are full of chromatic noise and occasionally obscure detail.
 * The subject is poorly cut out, see e.g. top centre and bottom right.
 * The subject is not cut off, the sculpture is like that. Can the chromatic aberration be corrected? -- Redtigerxyz Talk 04:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * With the stock photoshop lens distortion filters CA can be improved in some areas, but it seems to make it worse in others, you could try spending a few hours selectively desaturating the cyan channel to improve matters, I don't know if it'd help red without effecting the rest of the image though. I'd like to add to the list that whoever cut out the image from it's background did a pretty average job, the square edges of the cropping are extremely clear. You would probably be better off with a black point adjustment if you were trying to kill noise. Noodle snacks (talk) 07:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Seconder:

