Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Red roses

Red roses


a beautiful image of Roses in spring. First time nominating need Comments also I want to know if it has featured picture quality.


 * Nominated by: Sasukekun22 (talk) 08:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Comments:
 * I like this, it has some very strong elements. Pictorially, the lighting is good and descriptive, water droplets are wonderful and where it's sharp, it's easily sharp and detailed enough for FP. It's high resolution, there's no unpleasant noise and the bokeh is quite attractive. A smaller aperture would have ruined visual depth and wouldn't have rendered the foreground rosebud appreciably sharper. However, intrusive, distracting elements like that bud and the over-exposed white flowers bottom right would most likely be enough to attract more opposes than supports at FPC. A couple of pointers: a 10% crop in from both sides would frame the subject much better; there's a dead (white) pixel to clone out bottom left; for encyclopedic value, and for any chance at all at FPC, you'd have to accurately identify the species on the image description page and in the caption. It's a quality photo, despite all that.--mikaultalk 18:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Seconder:
 * Nominated at FPC as Featured picture candidates/Red Roses by Sasukekun22. --jjron (talk) 08:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

