Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Saint Vitus Cathedral

Saint Vitus Cathedral, Prague, Czech Republic


It illustrates this part of the cathedral well, so it has a high EV. Technically, it is also a good picture. I'm not quit sure though, whether to nominate it or not. I also would like to know if it is better than the current FP and if the two could be both a FP. Current FP: see below --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 13:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Creator:Massimo Catarinella


 * Nominated by: Massimo Catarinella (talk) 13:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comments:
 * The current FP really is superior in several aspects. The slightly different angle, cropping, and symmetry lend a more definite subject (the three lit stained glass windows) than in yours, and the lighting is more even and the exposure more emphatic for the subject. It's okay to have more than one FP of the same subject, but give how similar these two are, I think the only way for it to pass would be to replace the current one. Given the flaws of this picture against the current FP, a replacement is unlikely. Thegreenj 04:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Seconder:

