Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Tawny Frogmouth

Tawny Frogmouth

 * I'm not sure how these would go on FPC since the body is cut off, the left-most one is currently on Com:qic and Com:fpc and seems to be going OK, But I would particularly like opinions on wether they're too dark or use of flash too obvious etc. and, of course, the merits of each one.--Benjamint444 04:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * com:fpc nomination [|com:fpc]

Comments:
 * Nominate and support. - Benjamint444 04:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The images are not to dark, the flash took care of that; and, while obvious the use of flash is not very distracting. The composition is of main concern and I would say could do with improvement. 3 looked best in that respect to me but tastes do very. Just the composition would make for a rough time in FPC. -Fcb981 23:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Seconder:



Woodlouse
Comments:
 * Nominate and support. - --Benjamint444 03:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It might pass, it does have artifacts all over the background and 'wow factor' is pretty, meh, but otherwise a good shot. My best guess is a 15% chance of passing. -Fcb981 23:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Seconder:

