Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Watering cans

Watering Cans


The image is high resolution with attention to multiple watering cans. May not have a wow factor, but it does illustrate the subject well. I would be interested to see if any modifications are needed for the image to reach FP status.


 * Articles this image appears in:Watering can


 * Creator:Bas Leenders


 * Suggested by: Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments:
 * I'm not sure an image of watering cans would have enough EV to get nominated as a FP. People tend to be very critical of images that have limited use on pages. Technically it's a good photograph I think. — raeky ( talk 05:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Well we do have a sprinkler, so it's a possibility :-). Having said which I find the lighting on this one not too comfortable and composition a little awkward. --jjron (talk) 12:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe I can try for the most boring FP ever, that can be my hook to get people interested (at least the sprinkler has water in motion). I was glad the lighting wasn't overexposed, but some of the shadows do appear distracting. Would the lighting be able to be adjusted in Photoshop (such as removing the light on some of the cans and the back wall)? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:38, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I like the sprinkler. This, however, has too many issues. The distracting cut out light in the background, the poor contrast, and the cluttered subjects to name a few.  Nezzadar   ☎   05:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking a look. The contrast could be adjusted, but can the lighting be modified using Photoshop? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The lighting can be modified to an extent, but IMO not enough, and not much point as other issues would likely take it out anyway. --jjron (talk) 13:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Seconder:

