Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Aquarium Fish/archive1


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Portal:Aquarium Fish
Drew Smith 12:30, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Needs a lot of work. No topics, archives -- suggest looking at the FP criteria and current featured portals. feydey (talk) 16:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Agreed. First, and very important if you want to aim for featured portals, you need to have a selection of articles. Having a selected section for each month just don't cut it anymore because people neglect and discontinue the maintenance soon after the portal is promoted. Also, aim for high-quality articles/pictures. A good indicate for articles would be GA/FA while the indicator for pictures are FP/valued images/valued pictures. OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Very good advice. I'm not really aiming for FP though. I'm mostly trying to promote the assoiciated wikiproject. And as long as there is one other active member I will continue to update the portal regardless of it's standing. I was hoping to get some advice on whether or not it was structurally sound, appealing o they eye, etc. Thank you for taking a look though.  D   rew   S    mith 19:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * If you regularly maintain it, you don't need to spend a lot of extra effort to give it a push to become featured. OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.