Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Briarcliff Manor, New York/archive1

Portal:Briarcliff Manor, New York
I believe this meets FP criteria, however I would like another set of eyes before nominating it. Thank you. ɱ (talk · vbm  · coi) 20:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It's a nice tidy portal but I don't believe you have enough content highlighted for featured status. Usually at least 15 to 20 items per section is required. Espresso Addict (talk) 09:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. I have two problems with that idea; the first is that the Featured Portal criteria don't mention that you need a lot of content highlighted, and the criteria therefore also doesn't present any numbers. It however simply states that a portal "may be designed to have a higher turnover of content" (emphasis added). The other problem with that idea is the scope of a topic, where Briarcliff Manor only has about 20 directly relevant articles. With biographies, that number expands considerably of course, so I could potentially do what you mention to the Article, Biography, and Picture boxes. However if you want more DYKs I would have to fabricate some from scratch. There should be an exception for smaller portals; I really wouldn't like to have to do all of that work if it's not fully necessary. What do you think? ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 18:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)