Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Cape Cod and the Islands/archive1

Portal:Cape Cod and the Islands

 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I am creating this review at the suggestion of Bencherlite. Basically I want to nominate this as a Featured Portal and any insight gained here would help me greatly. Thank you. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments. I think you're off to an excellent start here. The layout is tidy, with clean quiet colours which reflect the subject matter nicely. There's a good variety of content with some interesting images. I've included some suggestions for improvement below that you might like to consider.


 * The Introduction seemed a little muddled to me (in complete ignorance of the area). I think a sketch map would help a lot, either in the Introduction or elsewhere. Most Introductions include one or more images, which sometimes rotate. (There's an example of code for rotating images at Portal:Philosophy of science/Intro.)


 * Portals usually have two forms of article highlighted, often biographies and articles (though I've seen eg mountains, towns and species as well in geographical portals). I think you've probably got enough material to split off biographies, although you'd probably need to add extra items to both sets to meet most reviewers' standards for featured -- 12–15 of each is a good minimum to aim for.


 * Whatever type of split you go for, most portals put images into both the article-type boxes. You can also put 100x100px images in the DYKs -- in fact you've got one in there that states (pictured) -- though actually the pictures don't have to have been aired on the main page, as long as they look ok at the small size.


 * The Selected Article blurbs vary a lot in length, which will make balancing the columns impossible. Several seemed rather long -- the guidelines suggest around 200 words is ideal. Once you've got the lengths fixed, some of the blurbs could do with copy editing (eg for en rules in date ranges, italics for titles, removing red links & any stray references). The style is usually to wikilink the bold text at the start of the box rather than (or sometimes as well as) using a "Read more..." link.


 * The Selected Picture legends all should probably link to some related article. I'd suggest varying the width of the image depending on whether it's portrait or landscape, so that the box doesn't vary in size as much. You probably want to create some slots at the bottom of the archive page, as you have elsewhere, to make it easy to add new images.


 * I'd trim the title for Quotes -- it's obvious they're related to the portal title.


 * In the news is a little out of date, with only one item from 2010. You can try to find your own news items rather than relying on Wikinews, although I find it's a lot of hard work for rather little output. You might be better deleting the section altogether.


 * I'd suggest trimming the Quality content section, excluding the former articles, DYKs (which should all be featured in the DYK box, anyway), ITNs & main-page featuring etc.


 * I'd suggest shortening the Things you can do section -- it's a bit overwhelming at the moment. I wasn't sure what the difference was between "Lists to de-redlink" and "Lists to complete".


 * Hope this helps and isn't too overwhelming! Espresso Addict (talk) 04:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not, but I will get to it this weekend at the earliest as I am extremely busy for the next few days. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.