Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Hampshire/archive1

Hampshire
Any comments are welcome, particularly anything that would help the portal to reach featured portal status.-- Waggers 17:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey, Anyways, with the changes, you should be on you're way. Jo e  I  19:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro - The shortcut is really taking up space. Personally I  don't like them on the main page(talk would be ok), but you must have it, please put it somewhere else.
 * The map shouldn't need a caption. Do you have a seal or coat of arms you could use as well?
 * Related portals - Images would be nice to have.
 * Articles - Images shouldn't need captions.
 * Categories - The way it's laid out would work better.
 * Pics - Pics must fit on 800x600 screen. A photo credit is needed. Center the description.
 * All selected boxes - In the archives, instead of just a link to previous selections, please show it the way it appeared on the portal page.
 * Projects - Perhaps you could use WikiProject England and WikiProject UK subdivisions.
 * Hampshire Topics - Should be simply "Topics". Hampshire is what the portal is about, not a topic within. Seems like you should be able to find more topics, such as cities, football clubs, etc... The topics section should be fairly comprehensive.
 * Rotation - The "show new selections" button should be used.


 * Thanks very much for all that, some useful comments in there. There are one or two I disagree with (relating to the intro section) but I'll get to work on implementing the others.  For the record, here's where I disagree:
 * WP:SHORT says that shortcut boxes should be at the top of the page
 * I've given the map a caption to make the distinction clear between the administrative county and the historical county - the portal includes Southampton and Portsmouth, so is about the latter not the former. But I'll look for a coat of arms or a map of the wider area.  (In fact, if/when time permits, I'll try and emulate the map at Portal:Kent).
 * As I said, thanks of the comments and please don't take the disagreements personally, what you've said is very useful. Thanks again, Waggers 14:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)