Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 August 18

Image:Greg Scott 2006.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader different to author and no claim of GFDL release. Genisock2 17:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Levan_Urushadze.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

no indication of gfdl at source, no explicit attribution of or statement by copyright holder ˉˉanetode╦╩ 15:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Omegaspreem.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that this is a public domain photo. Videmus Omnia Talk  01:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Crosswise-cybertron.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of GFDL. Videmus Omnia Talk  01:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite the addition of what appears to be a nonfree media rationale, anyone could buy this toy on amazon.com and take a picture of it. Calliopejen1 19:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristy McNichol.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader admits that this image is photoshopped. Therefore a derivative work, and not something the uploader has the rights to release. Corvus cornix 02:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will contact the appropriate Wikipedia department to confirm I am the copyright holder of this artwork/illustration.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristy McNichol Emmy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Photoshopped, derivative work, does not belong to the uploader. Corvus cornix 02:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, apparently this photo was uploaded under the wrong category. I will reupload this photo under the category of that which Julia Roberts had a similar photo uploaded of her that shows her holding an Oscar.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristy McNichol - Little Darlings.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader is not the copyright holder. Corvus cornix 02:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will resubmit this photo under the appropriate category and related film's page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristy McNichol - Only When I Laugh.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader is not the copyright holder. Corvus cornix 02:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will resubmit this photo under the appropriate category and film page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristy McNichol - Empty Nest.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader is not the copyright holder. Corvus cornix 02:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will resubmit this photo under the appropriate category and film page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristy and Jimmy McNichol.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader is not the copyright holder. Corvus cornix 02:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will resubmit this photo under the appropriate category.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Wardawn01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unlikely to be GFDL. Videmus Omnia Talk  03:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:George_fitch_2005.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately neither beeing used on his campaighn website nor giving permission to use on Wikipedia and related sites means it has actualy been released under a GFDL / CC-by-sa dual license. There needs to be an explicit permission to release under those actual licenses for those to apply, see WP:COPYREQ. Sherool (talk) 07:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Saul_Anuzis.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence image is released into the public domain. See link to website. Garion96 (talk) 10:00, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kashmiri tribal surrender.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image was taken by the Indian military, in Indian territory, and was first published in India. The picture has been uploaded under an incorrect lisence tag, ie. public domain in Pakistan.Zaindy87 12:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The Pakistan argument is rather irrelevant, as it has an India tag as well. I hate to say it, but the photo will fall into public domain in India in 4.5 months, and it almost seems like we should just let it sit around til then, as it's doubtful the Indian military will suye in the meantime. The Evil Spartan 03:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It can be undeleted in a few months then. It's not a question of whether WP will be sued.  It's just not reusable free content yet. --  But | seriously | folks   03:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristy_McNichol_with_Franco.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk  18:53, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will resubmit this photo under the appropriate category.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristy_McNichol_-_Women_of_Valor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk  18:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

This photo is really supposed to be uploaded under the Fair Use Act as its enhancements aren't enough to make it my copyright. I will go back to the photo and make sure it was uploaded und the Fair Use Act.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Untitled 1982.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as GFDL and non-free. Probably non-free. Also missing source. --- RockMFR 20:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Kept - someone already changed the license; marked di-no source. The Evil Spartan 03:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:DouglasKnight.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Procedural listing from declined speedy. Reason was: "no proof image has been released into the public domain. just ripped off from http://www.clandouglassociety.org/. image looks like a scan from a book. user who uploaded it has a long list of copyright violations." The last sentence is absolutely correct.  But | seriously | folks   22:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.