Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 August 29



Image:KLA Soldiers12.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Clearly has a watermark and a registered symbol. User claiming GFDL. and


 * Watermark states Corbis ®, I very much doubt this is a "personal image" as it states. 193.11.208.247 15:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:TMK humvee.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Clearly has a URL listed on the image itself. User claiming GFDL. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 11:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Samba.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; for now- F ASTILY  (TALK) 21:49, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

[1] Y4kk 12:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Already been deleted and replaced w/ a completely different image, it looks like. Calliopejen1 20:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Paul Wilkinson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

User claims GFDL and asserts permission on his talk page, but no actual proof of GFDL is provided. — cholmes75 (chit chat) 18:13, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The problem here is that I can't provide Paul Wilkinson's personal number or his secretary's as it is confidential, but you can contact St. Andrew's University. If an administrator ask me for his secretary's email, I will gladly provide it, so it can be verified at the University. He is retiring soon and the next time I see Paul, I will take more pictures of him and will replace the disputed picture though the use of image is fully authorized. --Cyril Thomas 22:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Uploader apparently did not take photo and therefore cannot release it. -- But | seriously | folks   22:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.