Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 August 4



Image:Portrait-of-john-heaver-fremlin-1980.jpg
No source or copyright holder identified. Videmus Omnia Talk  00:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gagomadrid.jpg
Image can be found at to name one of a few - J acќя М   ¿Qué?  01:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jewel_jujubear.jpg
Appears to be a derivative work of several publicity photos, with no sources of original works given. Videmus Omnia Talk  01:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:C119g-53-7844.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL as tagged. Nv8200p talk 01:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:CASHP0977.jpg
Improperly tagged as GFDL Nv8200p talk 02:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:CASHP129_lowww.jpg
Improperly tagged as GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:CDHS.JPG
From a copyrighted website with no evidence uploader has authority to release under GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:CFTBL.jpg
From a copyrighted website with no evidence uploader has authority to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:CFairclough.jpg
From a copyrighted website with no evidence uploader has authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:CIMG0417.JPG
From a copyrighted web site. No evidence that uploader took this image as claimed. Nv8200p talk 03:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:CKLin.jpg
From a copyrighted website. No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 03:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:CP_pinball_machine.jpg
From a copyrighted website. No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 03:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jonesatt.jpg
Source website gives no indication of releasing any of the images under Creative Commons, and there is no evidence that they were otherwise released under that license. fuzzy510 03:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I have corresponded personally with the copyright holder (David Kozlowski) and received permission to use this photograph. I know it is OK for us to use this image.  If there is an issue here, it is a technical issue that can be easily resolved. If there's something I haven't done that needs to be done in order to properly catalog this release status, please let me know and I'll get it taken care of.  Thanks.--Elred 13:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:COPYREQ for details on what is required as verification that something have been released under terms suitable for use on Wikipedia. --Sherool (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * working on it. thanks.--Elred 19:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:MAGIC.JPG
Tagged PD-self but appears to be station's official logo.  But | seriously | folks   04:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed to non-free logo, which seems most likely. Calliopejen1 12:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:FX.JPG
Tagged PD-self but appears to be station's official logo.  But | seriously | folks   04:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed to non-free logo, which seems most likely. Calliopejen1 12:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:XL.JPG
Tagged PD-self but appears to be station's official logo.  But | seriously | folks   04:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed to non-free logo, which seems most likely. Calliopejen1 12:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:LOGISYS.JPG
Tagged PD-self but appears to be official logo.  But | seriously | folks   04:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:CHMA.JPG
Tagged PD-self but appears to be station's official logo.  But | seriously | folks   04:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed to non-free logo, which seems most likely. Calliopejen1 12:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:THEWAVE.JPG
Tagged PD-self but appears to be station's official logo.  But | seriously | folks   04:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed to non-free logo, which seems most likely. Calliopejen1 12:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:K100.JPG
Tagged PD-self but appears to be station's official logo.  But | seriously | folks   04:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:THEFOX.JPG
Tagged PD-self but appears to be station's official logo.  But | seriously | folks   04:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed to non-free logo, which seems most likely. Calliopejen1 12:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nash-FM.JPG
Tagged PD-self but appears to be station's official logo.  But | seriously | folks   04:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:CIRC.JPG
Tagged PD-self but uploader has uploaded other images that appear to be stations' official logos.  But | seriously | folks   04:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:REV.JPG
Tagged PD-self but appears to be official logo.  But | seriously | folks   04:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Eromanga.jpg
This seems to be some sort of porn comic book from japan and I believe the uploader should prove it is indeed public domain. I doubt it is.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 06:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Deleted because it was used in vandalism. See . --Core desat 06:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:GamalAbdelNasser.jpg
Uploader claims fair use and that no free alternatives exist but WikiCommons have photos at Gamal Abdel Nasser — Thuresson 14:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC).
 * This should be taken to IfD instead of here, since the image certainly is unfree (it's even tagged as such). --fuzzy510 17:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I have RFU'ed the photo instead. Thuresson 19:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:ThePete.jpg
Listed as being released into the public domain by the uploader, but found on this website]. fuzzy510 17:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Since this was uploaded in May, is it not a possibility that the website in question obtained the photo from Wikipedia? Dar-Ape 19:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * This is also the main photo at the official page, http://www.drs.pitt.edu/map/PCNTR.htm. Unlikely that the WP user created it. Calliopejen1 20:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:D14_colour.jpg
PD claim, but no evidence to suggest this, I doubt the uploader is the creator given the age of the loco depicted. Sfan00 IMG 19:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:D14_colour.jpg
PD claim, but no evidence to suggest this, I doubt the uploader is the creator given the age of the loco depicted. Sfan00 IMG 19:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Furnace_graphite.jpg
License is a bit unclear here, uploader clearly list himself as the author in the first upload, but then upload the file again aparently giving http://www.gbcsci.com/ as the source. No indication of free license release there. Sherool (talk) 19:48, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

I uploaded the file. It is property of company I work for and I have permission to upload. I don't know what more I can do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geoff c (talk • contribs) 04:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:SharpE beta 703.jpg
The software itself is LGPL licensed, however the desktop wallpaper that actualy make up like 95% of this screenshot doesn't seem to have any suitable license info, there is no indication on the deviatn art page that the photographer have released the image under any particular free license that would be suitable for Wikipedia. --Sherool (talk) 20:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Point taken. We (SharpE development team) will ascertain the status of the wallpaper in this screenshot or replace it with another that is devoid of wallpaper. Glacialfury 04:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC), SharpE Developer