Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 December 20



Image:The_Birthday_Party.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Questionable claim that the poster is not copyrighted while previously challenged as no good rationales for fair use. Jusjih (talk) 01:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Northwestern University's Theatre and Interpretation Center does not copyright their posters. --In Defense of the Artist (talk) 23:23, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * That is not legally possible. All creative works in the US are copyrighted automatically. We need a statement of release into some license that it is free. Please see WP:COPYREQ. MECU ≈ talk 14:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ice w2003 fiji3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted- F ASTILY  (TALK) 22:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD in Fiji, but not in the US. Shell babelfish 01:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

So do we block it from viewing in the US?? or how do get around this? seek your advice on thisone or anyone else interested in giving some advice? Vinaka Maikeli MB (talk) 20:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Image deleted. The image would have to have been taken before 1946 to be public domain in the United States. I don't believe the image would pass WP:NFCC #8 or #1 to allow a fair use claim. -Nv8200p talk 21:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:MarkBurnettJoyCantilo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I only see all rights reserved from the Flickr source today. Jusjih (talk) 02:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Uploader says "asked for permission". No OTRS though. MECU ≈ talk 14:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Wholefoodsmarket_1981.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Insufficient evidence of claimed copyright permission claim. Jusjih (talk) 02:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Matt_fanfare.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I see cc-by-nc-sa today but am unsure if this was ever without "nc". Jusjih (talk) 02:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Oulton_td.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source site does not show the permission, so OTRS confirmation, please? Jusjih (talk) 02:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Opera Mini logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G6 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure that vector images are automatically in the public domain. Template:PD-font certainly doesn't seem to think so. In any case, Image:Opera Mini logo.png, which is clearly in the public domain, is now used instead, so we probably don't need this copy any more anyway. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Image is on Commons now. MECU ≈ talk 14:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:2007 WCU vegas logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyrighted logo. Chris.B (talk) 14:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:RevolsReunion.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 22:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

looks like a scan of newspaper Rettetast (talk) 16:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The image summary has been updated, and the copyright information changed to the proper Newspaper / Fair User Rationale Qwepasdl (talk) 20:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:VG30DETT-Intercooler.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Claims own work, but looks like a promo drawing. Liftarn (talk) 16:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Revols79.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader has uploaded a lot of images that obviously is not self creations Rettetast (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC) Sadly, I'm doing a poor job, and I'm hoping for some guidance to properly verify these images, so that they can not be disputed. I'd be really thanful for your input and help. I was guided through "Fair Use Rationales" on many of the original upload of these images, which didn't stick, for the newspaper articles. the photographs have never been disputed as "original work" before, I'm hoping for some help, verifying them for public release. Thanks for your help Qwepasdl (talk)
 * These images are owned by the son of Ken Kalmusky who has personally scanned them, and given me permission to release their copyright, to the public, for the creation of these Wikipedia articles, to document this history.


 * I have updated this Image summary, with verification of the images copyright. Qwepasdl (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:RevolsHudsons.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept as amended Skier Dude  ( talk ) 01:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

looks like a scan of newspaper Rettetast (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I have changed the copyright to the proper FairUse / Newspaper rationale, and updated the photo's Summary with appropriate publishers information, and summary. Qwepasdl (talk) 20:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:FabFour1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Rettetast (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I have updated this Image summary, with verification of the images copyright. Qwepasdl (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:FabFourFanClub.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

see above Rettetast (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I have updated this Image summary, with verification of the images copyright. Qwepasdl (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:TheRevols1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

see above Rettetast (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I have updated this Image summary, with verification of the images copyright. Qwepasdl (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Revols3.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

see above Rettetast (talk) 16:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I have updated this Image summary, with verification of the images copyright. Qwepasdl (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Rachel in Hollywood.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image copied from Flickr tagged as "All rights reserved". On the other hand, the Flickr account itself says all photos are "extracted from the Internet". So likely copyvio. — Kelvinc (talk) 19:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:2006 cfc leaders conference.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Another image that was missed as a part of a mass nomination at Possibly unfree images/2007 December 6 - it is ostensibly owned by Couples for Christ and was originally uploaded and tagged as a non-free promo photo. After this was challenged, it was retagged. We need evidence of a copyright release to be sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. B (talk) 22:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.