Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 July 13



Image:Janet Jackson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is taken from http://www.janet-online.com, an image archive which states in its disclaimer that "The content in the pictures section derives mostly from visitors' contributions, therefore we cannot control the source of these pictures". It would make sense that the creator of the image would have a watermark-less version to upload. Kurt Shaped Box 00:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Janet Photo 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD claimed. Looks like a professional press/publicity shot. Kurt Shaped Box 00:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Janet Fan Photo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD claimed. Looks like a professional press/publicity shot. Kurt Shaped Box 00:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:TheLonelyIsland.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The Creative Commons license linked to is CC-BY-NC-SA, which is not a free license by Wikipedia standards. Videmus Omnia 00:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristian.bjorn.hisxpress.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of GFDL license. Videmus Omnia 02:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This looks legit - see Successful_requests_for_permission (linked to on image page). A concern does arise that they granted the GFDL to wikipedia, but I'm not sure if it's worth pursuing.... Calliopejen1 13:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:White_Scars.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Derivative of a copyrighted work, see here. Videmus Omnia 03:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bobby-dall-2004b.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of free license at given source. Videmus Omnia 03:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)] Commons image SkierRMH  ( talk ) 00:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Thompson_Fraser_Confluence.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of CC license at source website. Videmus Omnia 03:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I will clarify on photo-tips.ca that some photos on that website have also been licensed under CC and posted to Wikipedia, or Wikimedia. Hopefully that satisfies your concern.  (For the record, I am the photographer, and I also run the website photo-tips.ca) Webgeer 20:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Royal_Doulton_Darby_and_Joan.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Derivative work. Videmus Omnia 04:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Royal_dalton_(rose_of_love)_4o06.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Derivative work. Videmus Omnia 04:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I would be grateful if you would explain the rules behind this request for deletion. Does fair use apply? Snowman 07:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It is a 2D image of a 3D model, so this may not count as a derivative work. Snowman 17:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Zupa_donja.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged PD but attributed to a website with a copyright notice.  But | seriously | folks   04:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Zuniceratops.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as copyrighted but usable if attributed, but artist's site (http://prehistoricsillustrated.com/pg_tm_38.html) indicates all rights reserved.  But | seriously | folks   04:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Stethacanthus.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as copyrighted and usable if attributed, but artist's website (http://prehistoricsillustrated.com/paleogallery_toddmarshall.html) indicates all rights reserved.  But | seriously | folks   04:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Zuneuserbox.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

It's a user-made copy of the Zune logo, which is copyrighted, so it's a derivative work and nonfree.  But | seriously | folks   05:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Zune3inDisplaywithValeninesDaySkinuv411.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is user created, but the artwork in the image is someone else's work, so it's nonfree.  But | seriously | folks   05:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Zune-dvd-interface.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is user created but content is someone else's work, including logo, therefore nonfree.  But | seriously | folks   05:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Zulukidze.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as PD, but ownership of an image does not equal ownership of its copyright. Author is not identified.  But | seriously | folks   05:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Halloween1991.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is unfree Gopher backer 05:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC).
 * When I upload this image, I thought it was from a US Government source, but it turns out that it was created by someone else and was just being used the govt. page. Go ahead and delete it.  Gopher backer 14:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Sanj_Players_at_Ashura.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as GFDL but this user has serious copyright issues (Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive239#User:ParthianShot).  But | seriously | folks   06:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:PublicExecutionIRI.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as GFDL, but uploader has serious copyright issues (Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive239#User:ParthianShot).  But | seriously | folks   06:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Crest_of_Gondopharr_(according_to_Iranian_sources).JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as GFDL but uploader has serious copyright issues (Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive239#User:ParthianShot).  But | seriously | folks   07:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:29junbh2.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader tagged this image as PD-self but the image contains a copyright credit and was taken from the official On The Verge website. No indication that the uploader has secured permission from the copyright holder to release this image as PD. — Muchness 08:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:rodgab.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader tagged this image as PD-self but the image is taken from the official On The Verge website, which contains no image copyright info. Unverifiable copyright status. --Muchness 08:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

The photo was taken by myself for the OTV site. MichaelMalin 13.12, 13 July 2007
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:10novBH.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader tagged this image as PD-self but the image is taken from the official On The Verge website, which contains no image copyright info. Unverifiable copyright status. --Muchness 08:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Raymat_santiago.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. the uploader was previously been warned about uploading copyvio images. bluemask (talk) 08:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Samsung_mp3_player_12.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that uploader is author or that image is GFDL-licensed. Videmus Omnia 16:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bahar_Soomekh-2006_Academy_Awards.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image appears here on egotastic.com. It has no copyright there, but it is unlikely that the uploader is able to license it as PD-self Bigr  Tex  17:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Spitak Earthquake images
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 06:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Spitak Earthquake images
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 1.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 2.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 3.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 4.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 5.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 6.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 7.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 8.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 9.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 10.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 11.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 12.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 13.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 14.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Spitak Earthquake 15.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * 1988 isn't PD-old. No assertion has been made making this image PD. I seriously doubt the uploader has taken it. -- Cat chi? 17:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bethune_School-Building.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Description page says "no copyright" but this is from 1949. I don't see why it wouldn't be copyrighted, but perhaps someone can enlighten me.  howcheng  {chat} 17:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * oops, I was going to say pre-1978, no copyright, no problem, but this is from India. Won't enter public domain in India for another 2 years. -N 20:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:BiscayneLandingphotos.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

User claimed that he created it but no proof given. Sasquatch t|c 17:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Dale Thomas images
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 06:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC) Transferred from Images and media for deletion/2007 July 7. They were kept because IFD is not a place for editorial decisions, but I am challenging the licensing (PD-self) on what appear to be professional photos. --  howcheng  {chat} 23:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Dale_thomas_78.jpg
 * Image:Dale_thomas_160.jpg
 * Image:Dale_thomas_979.png
 * Image:Dale_thomas_1159.jpg
 * Image:Dale_thomas_694.jpg
 * Image:Dale_thomas_1199.jpg
 * Image:Dale_thomas_933.jpg
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.