Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 July 15



Image:GayAsianMen.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

No source has been listed; image does not seem to belong anywhere, and the user that uploaded it linked to it on the page for Hedley, an article that is completely unrelated to it. DearPrudence 02:02, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Image appears to have been uploaded for vandalistic purpose only. Speedily deleted.--Alf melmac 21:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Euromalays.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Obviously a derivative work, original sources unattributed. Videmus Omnia Talk  02:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Eurasians.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Obviously a derivative work, original sources not specified. Videmus Omnia Talk  02:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Michael Fedele.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

State of Colorado Connecticut photo, not Federal.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  03:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I think you mean State of Connecticut. Regardless it is indeed copyrighted material that has been posted and deleted before.&mdash;Elipongo (Talk contribs) 03:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * D'oh. Corrected.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  03:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

I actually e-mail him, and he said: "The photo is in fact the official photo for Lt. Governor Michael Fedele and is available for public use."

~Conor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conor69 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Steve Pence.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

State of Kentucky photo, presumably. Not federal.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  03:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:OfficialheadshotAnthonyBrown.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Dubious public domain claim.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  03:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I love the fact that the image file name actually includes "official head shot". Found the original on the state site . It's elsewhere as well so it is probably in his press pack photo. Still replaceable though so wouldn't qualify as fair use.Madmedea 14:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:JohnDCherryPortrait.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence given that this is public domain.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  03:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:GOD11.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Statute may be old, but art does not appear to be old and needs to be confirmed as PD.  But | seriously | folks   04:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Geoshradcbe030.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader MIGHT be photographer with website http://www.peermade.info/geoshrad/phot.htm, but this has to be confirmed.  But | seriously | folks   04:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Jack-dalrymple-56.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

State of North Dakota image, not PD.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  04:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Gonopharr_Crest.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as GFDL but uploader has serious copyright problems. See Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive239.  But | seriously | folks   04:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:DDaugaard.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

"This is a product of the State of South Dakota, and is therefore in the public domain", says the summary. Uh, no.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  04:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Lawton barbara official.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Presumably a State of Wisconsin photo.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  04:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

"The official images posted are public domain for your use and distribution." from the Official website: http://ltgov.wisconsin.gov/mediaroom.asp?locid=126&linkid=1068
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Brahmi Script.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 09:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe this may qualify as PD-ineligible.  howcheng  {chat} 22:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe would qualify for PD-ineligible but deleted as orphan. -Nv8200p talk 22:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Asokan Brahmi inscription.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Satavahana cave inscription.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ikshvaku inscription.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Salankayana Nandivarma inscription.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Vishnukundina inscription.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Pallava Narasimha Varma I inscription.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Chalukya Bhima II inscription.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Chalukya Rajaraja Narendra inscription.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kakatiya Ganapati Deva inscription.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Inscription at time Errana.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Inscription at time Srinatha.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Christian writings in Telugu (1747).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Inscription at time of Krishnadeva Raya.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Printed Telugu from the 1817 grammar by William Brown.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though :. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment for this and all the above similar nominations these are reproductions of several centuries old texts, so PD-art should apply. The images appear to have been orphaned so I can't determine their encyclopedic value though. -Nard 17:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Largelogo.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

GFDL claim - Sorce site says -"© 2007 purplemonkeygames.com" - No evidence of an OTRS ticket/release ShakespeareFan00 13:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Nsync_photo.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

PD Claim- but no evidence/source of this given ShakespeareFan00 13:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:ال چیم
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Douglasmtaylor 13:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bordeux-airport-today.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Boris_ms3.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Boriscure.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that the uploader has authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Boxcar2.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence user has authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 22:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bpn.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence that uploader has the right to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 23:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bradycaptain.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; for now.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 22:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC) No evidence that uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 23:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It used to be on Derek Ward's photo website available for anyone to view, along with all photos allowed to be released under the GFDL. It was clearly stated but no archived version of the page is still accessible. The image is also available on the official Holy Cross High School website, and will be included in the index of the main page starting at the beginning of the next school year. Signed by Tommy [[Image:Misc-tpvgames.gif]] (Talk/Contribs) 04:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Assuming Tommyboy isn't lying, the image must be GFDL (since the license is non-retractable). Seems reasonable, so I'm keeping. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bram.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 23:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Commons image showing through. -- But | seriously | folks   05:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.