Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 July 21



Image:ChauntelleDupreein2003.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

possibly work for hire cohesion 03:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I have similar concerns over the image.Genisock2 18:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Med-Guerra-Mondragon, Gabriel.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Says it's an official government portrait, but the link goes straight to the image file. The claim is plausible but the uploader has a history of not understanding copyright law and wikipedia copyright policies. (I've been going through his log and tagging almost every image for deletion.) — Calliopejen1 03:34, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete wikipedia asks for the source which means the uploader should attempt to provide author, creating organization, date of publication and other essential details, a link to an anonymous url (which isn't a government website) is not acceptable Bleh999 05:20, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Med.png and others

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 06:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

User uploaded a jillion professional-quality photos of footballers. His first images got deleted, then he presumably switched to saying he created them himself. One picture says "Author = me, [Source = collingwoodfc.com.au]". I left a message on his talk page asking whether he had taken the photos himself and he never responded. Also nominating Image:Js02gall RHS.jpg, Image:Lockyer.png, Image:Travs.JPG, Image:Leon mark.jpg, Image:Rhyce.jpg, Image:Goosematt.jpg, Image:Danny.png, Image:Marty6.jpg, Image:Risingstar.jpg, Image:Sean Rusling 135px.jpg, Image:Dalethomas.jpg, Image:Lonie 2.jpg, Image:Nathan 5.jpg, Image:Brodie holland 6.jpg, Image:Shane obree 11.jpg, Image:Cox 12.jpg, Image:Wakes1.jpg, Image:Egan 15.jpg, Image:Nath brown 16.jpg, Image:Ryancook.jpg, Image:Dannynicholls.jpg, Image:Jackanthony.jpg, Image:B reid.jpg, Image:Chrisdawes.jpg, Image:B dick.jpg, and Image:Iles.jpg for the same reason. — Calliopejen1 06:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kim-chiu.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

no evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner. no evidence of being released under GFDL/CC from stated sources. bluemask (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:CoverProper-WG-001-SunYe.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD claim- but artwork is unsourced, in addition it looks like a promotinal composite Sfan00 IMG 10:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:CoverProper-WG-004-YeEun.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

As per previous listing for same uploader Sfan00 IMG 11:01, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:CoverProper-WG-005-SoHee.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

As per previous listing for same uploader Sfan00 IMG 11:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:CoverProper-WG-002-HyunAh.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

As per previous listing for same uploader Sfan00 IMG 11:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:CoverProper-WG-003-SunMi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

As per previous listing for same uploader Sfan00 IMG 11:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bryndonedit2.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 12:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Brycecanyon-window.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 12:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Brother_Dash_in_London_2005.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Commons image SkierRMH  ( talk ) 07:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bronson_1973.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:10, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

I took this photo of Bronson, and I uploaded it as a service to Wikipedia. I have granted free license. Fish Cop 19:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn -Nv8200p talk 00:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:British_art.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:34, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Federschwert.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Source only given as "Taken by David Welch with ARMA East Tennessee" no link or any other indication who "David Welch" is or how he released the image as public domain. — Liftarn 14:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Fiat Barchetta concept.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The image is supposedly released under the GFDL, however no author/source info is given, plus it looks very much like a commercial image. Hux 15:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Rossi3.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

gettyimages watermark; no source, license or attribution; no FUR S up? 15:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Ppsalbum.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Album cover - (C) resuambly with albums publishers - No evidence uploader is same Sfan00 IMG 15:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Aicelle_Santos2.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Shot is a composite promo shot Sfan00 IMG 16:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Nicktrop_Shell_with_markup.PNG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Dervied work from copyrighted web artwork.- No indication of permission of ORIGINAL copyright holder Sfan00 IMG 16:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Nick_wp_logo.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Logo infringes upon Nickeldon logo ( a protected trademark IIRC) Sfan00 IMG 16:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I created it using the Bazooka font, check in a text editor, and you'll see it is the font Nick uses in their logo. Also, you will note it is not of the best quality, as I slapped it together within about a minute. It is intended specifically for one of my userboxes, so I will change the liscensing to fair use.  JONJONBT  talk • homemade userboxes  16:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Before you do, please be sure you have reviewed WP:FUC. Thanks. --S up? 19:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:44013042_worcest_droitwitch.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G12 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image source specified as the BBC website, whereas the image is licensed under the GFDL. There is no indication that the uploader is also the creator of the picture (possibly mistagged). S up? 19:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.