Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 July 26



July 26
Commons image SkierRMH  ( talk ) 07:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:ProfessorandLarryJennings.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence image is licensed under Creative Commons. Videmus Omnia Talk  00:10, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Let's see, I uploaded this back in October 2006... As I recall, I was in direct communication with the image creator, Dan Sylvester, at the time. He volunteered the images, but wasn't really wiki-literate enough to upload them himself, so I acted as his agent.  I made sure he was clear at the time on CC-by-SA 2.5, and he was definitely okay on it.  Since we're stricter about this kind of thing now though, I agree that it's worth confirming the paperwork. I'll go ahead and get back in contact with him, and request a formal "license confirmation" email which can be forwarded along to permissions.  Once I get the email, I'll probably also move this image (and some others he provided) over to Commons. --Elonka 05:17, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * (followup) I have obtained the necessary email from the image creator, and the image has been moved over to the Commons. I'd delete it here on EN, but (ahem) don't have admin access yet.  So I've tagged it with ncd so that someone else can delete it at their leisure.  Thanks, Elonka 20:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:AU3LIB.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as PD-self, but this image is from http://www.auburn.edu/student_info/cheerleaders/pictures/pictures_basketball.html - it is the last image (far right) in the series of basketball photos B  02:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:AUVSFLORIDA.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as PD-self, but it is from http://www.auburn.edu/student_info/cheerleaders/pictures/pictures.html - if you go to the football photos and tab over to the third page of them, it is the 6th photo on the third page B  02:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:AU4STUNT.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as PD-self, but the image is from http://www.auburn.edu/student_info/cheerleaders/pictures/pictures.html - if you go to the third page of images, it is the 4th from the right on the third page of football photos B  02:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Vajiralongkorn-Yuwathida.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Procedural listing. Declined speedy listed because: "This image is not PD. The same person also uploaded different photos from magazines, clip video, and so forth Speedy concern: This image is not PD. The same person also uploaded different photos from magazines, clip video, and so forth "  But | seriously | folks   03:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

correct Logo license applied SkierRMH  ( talk ) 07:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Iana logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free (not closed by me). Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC) As stated on image page, "Website logo of Iranian Agriculture News Agency". The logo must be copyright, but the author has licensed under GFDL. Dark Falls  talk 06:37, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed to nonfree logo. Calliopejen1 21:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Vajiralongkornfamily.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Procedural listing. Declined speedy. Deletion reason was: "This image is not PD. The same person also uploaded different photos from magazines, clip video, and so forth "  But | seriously | folks   08:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:SparkySeal.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged GFDL but summary indicates "Fair use". Which is it?  But | seriously | folks   08:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Update: Page now states image was scanned from a postcard.  I removed the GFDL tag. --  But | seriously | folks   07:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:742 evergreen terrace.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The image description says it is in the Public Domain, but it is obviously from a Simpsons episode. It is even said that the image comes from a Simpsons episode at the article 742 Evergreen Terrace. — Will  Mak  050389  16:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * To me it looks like someone has actually used a piece of software to recreate a shot of the Simpson's house - the clarity just looks too good - I assume that would still be a derivative image and therefore subject to copyright. Good argument for fair use though on the 742 Evergreen Terrace article as it certainly isn't replaceable.

I am thinking it could be used as long as it remains in that article. MagicPath111 05:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Madmedea 11:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

I think it is only right that this image stays on the page as it matches the article. I agree with the above comment. User:Steventattum 01:53, 12 August 2007 (BST)


 * Yes, I believe this image (or one that is similar) could be used in the article under fair use, but the uploader of this image claimed it is of a free license. Unless this is changed (or a free license can be proven to exist for this image), this particular image should not be kept. -- Will Mak  050389  20:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

It seems to need to be changed to a TV screenshot license, like other Simpsons images. Reywas92 Talk 20:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

correct Logo license applied SkierRMH  ( talk ) 07:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:NSSF.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence to verify GFDL license, and uploader is absent. Videmus Omnia Talk  18:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:NSSF.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Derivative of the above work (also therefore with unproven GFDL license). Videmus Omnia Talk  18:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Angelita Lind.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Claimed pd-us old, which is clearly wrong. It says specifically that it's the from the Puerto Rican culture institute: the copyright on that page says ® 2003 Todos los Derechos Reservados (all rights reserved). The Evil Spartan 20:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Juan Rodríguez.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Same as above The Evil Spartan 20:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Jesse Vassallo.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Same as above The Evil Spartan 20:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Raul Papaleo.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Same as above The Evil Spartan 20:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Angel Cordero.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Same as above: Puerto Rican images are not free; let alone can we be sure that the PR government is the author. The Evil Spartan 20:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

correct license applied SkierRMH  ( talk ) 07:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Hiram Bithorn.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 09:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Author's age makes public domain of photo doubtful. The Evil Spartan 20:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed to nonfree, added use rationale (could be better...). Calliopejen1 11:22, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristina Brandi.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No reason whatsoever to conclude this is PD The Evil Spartan 20:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Gordon Ironside.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader indicated that the photo is released under Creative Commons, but the website that it comes from says "Site Design and Content © Sutton Grammar School 2007". Admittedly, the image was uploaded in 2006, but they do have the rights to the image, and the uploader doesn't seem to have any right to release it. Corvus cornix 20:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Sutton Grammar School for Boys.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The website it comes from lists all of its content as "Site Design and Content © Sutton Grammar School 2007", no indication that the uploader had the right to release the image. Corvus cornix 21:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Spicegirls14.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PD claimed, though appears to be a professional publicity/print media shot. Source URL given returns a 'This photo is private' message, making verification impossible. Uploader is 16 years old, yet the contents of the photo (the Spice Girls, pre-1998 when Geri Halliwell departed the band) suggest that it was taken at least nine years ago, making his claim to be the creator somewhat unlikely. Kurt Shaped Box 21:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.