Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 July 7



Image:ATSMAP2007.JPG
Image is most likely NOT user-created and was taken from a copyrighted source. The image also includes a copyrighted logo at the bottom. — Dream out loud  (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Oliviadehavilland.jpg
looks like a publicity photo, including a serial number in the bottom right hand corner, although it says it is user created. — Rossrs 01:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I scaned it from my own photo and put my name on it!! What cat should it be in?-Sheila


 * Most likely it should be, and a source, copyright holder and fair use rationale will need to be added to the image description page.  Help:Image page gives a good explanation of what's needed.  Scanning a photo that you own does not mean you own the copyright for it, so the original tag was incorrect.  Hope this helps. Rossrs 16:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you and have changed it!! -Sheila

Image:BF_flyer.jpg
No evidence copyright holder granted uploader permisssion to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 01:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BOMB-Magazine-issue100.jpg
Permission documentation from BOMM magazine not supplied. Nv8200p talk 02:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BOMB-Magazine-issue3.jpg
Permission documentation from BOMB magazine not supplied. Nv8200p talk 02:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BRICKS_layered_architecture.png
Source website has all rights reserved. Not GFDL as claimed in image summary. Nv8200p talk 02:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BRICKS_user_access.png
Source website is all rights reserved, not GDFL as claimed in the image summary. Nv8200p talk 02:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Public Domain Image and correctly tagged. SkierRMH ( talk ) 23:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:BRIG2-1athumb.jpg
Summary describes two copyright owners and does not have permission of either to release as under GDFL or creeative commons. Nv8200p talk 02:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

?? I fail to see two copyright owners implied or listed in the summary .. which I wrote. As the sole copyright owner, I can certainly give permission for release as explained. Larry - please clarify ?
 * I may have interpreted the summary incorrectly. To the closing admin - If it looks legit to you, it is OK with me to keep. -Nv8200p talk 22:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Public Domain Image and correctly tagged. SkierRMH ( talk ) 23:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:BROWN1thumb.jpg
Summary claims two copyright holders and uploader does not have permission to release under GFDL or Creative Commons Nv8200p talk 02:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

?? I fail to see two copyright owners implied or listed in the summary .. which I wrote. As the sole copyright owner and uploader and author of article History of Full Rigged Ships, I can certainly give permission for release as explained. Larry - please clarify the problem here?
 * I may have interpreted the summary incorrectly. To the closing admin - If it looks legit to you, it is OK with me to keep. -Nv8200p talk 22:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Correct licensing and FUR now on image. SkierRMH ( talk ) 23:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:BSD_Flyer.jpg
No evidence of permission from copyright holder to releaseimage under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:37, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BWatch.png
Image is probably copyrighted by the owner's of the TV show the image is in with no evidence they granted permission to release under the GFDL or creative commons. Nv8200p talk 03:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Badr1Launch.jpg
No evidence copyright holder gave permission to uploader to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 03:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Baghdad.JPG
No evidence uploader has permission from copyright holder to relase image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 03:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What evidence is required? He was a personal friends of Lord Jellicoe so it's not unlikely. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 10:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thankyou, thankyou Gustav. 'Tis true.Rodolph 13:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

-- AGF here. Garion96 (talk) 12:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bahiadecorral.jpg
No evidence provided of any permissions granted. Nv8200p talk 03:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BahrainFormula1.jpg
No evidence of permission from copyright holder to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BahrainNationalMuseum.jpg
No evidence from copyright holder to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BahrainTradDressF.jpg
No evidence from copyright holder for permission to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Baiji.jpg
No evidence that copyright holder gave permission to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Baja_panorama.JPG
No evidence of permission from copyright holder to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Balawatroad.JPG
"Courtesy of . . ." does not mean permission to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly a US military image, but the given source www.sigil.mil does not exist and could not find it in web.archive.org either.  howcheng  {chat} 18:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:BalineseTranceSeance.jpg
No evidence copyright holder gave permission for uploader to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:3_Women_and_a_Chateau.jpg
Which license? MER-C 06:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Uploader has Wikipedia email enabled. Email asking clarification sent. -N 15:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No reply. -Nard 13:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Replying now: I made this image. Just learning wiki ways, and how to respond... thanks garyw101@earthlink.net

Replying again 11/14/11 I am the holder of the copyright of this image. I have uploaded it to wikipedia. Please don't delete. This image was part of the documentary film THREE WOMEN AND A CHATEAU, which was made by my production company, Luna Productions,and you can see that on my own website: http://lunaproductions.com/three-women-and-a-chateau/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gary gary gary (talk • contribs) 18:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Image:Dead60sband.jpg
Image is apparently taken from wallpaper on the band's site, but was released into the public domain by the copyright holder. Anybody else have a hard time believing that? fuzzy510 07:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Laura-M-13.jpg
Not work safe. Tagged as PD-self, but uploader unlikely to be creator. Videmus Omnia 16:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Commons image SkierRMH  ( talk ) 23:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:000.jpg
Not work safe. Tagged as PD-self, but uploader unlikely to be creator. Videmus Omnia 16:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:00000007.jpg
Not work safe. Tagged as PD-self, but uploader unlikely to be creator. Videmus Omnia 16:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Lord_Foulkes_of_Cumnock.jpg
GFDL licensed, but no proof that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia 17:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Going to lean towards assume good faith. I couldn't find an obvious web source for the image at this resolution. The closest I could get was http://www.lordfoulkes.com/lord_george_foulkes_news.htm - which I am going to assume is an official site. Given that it also links directly to wikipedia I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that Mr. Foulkes (or someone in his organization) has released the image. Megapixie 06:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

AGF here.  howcheng  {chat} 18:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Trevor_Blackwell.jpg
Licensed as GFDL, but no indication of this at source page. Videmus Omnia 17:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Uploaded new image, with cc-by-2.0 license, source http://www.flickr.com/photos/tlbtlbtlb/767591148/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlbtlbtlb (talk • contribs)
 * Comment: Based on the similarity of the user's Wikipedia name and the Flickr soure name, and the fact that image was uploaded to Flickr today, I was going to say this is a suspicious coincidence. But then I looked at the user's Flickr profile and other candid photos of Trevor Blackwell. And I noticed that Trevor Blackwell's website is tlb.org. This Wikipedia user is Trevor Blackwell and he's hiding it. (For good reason too, it looks like he's been editing articles about himself). If he wants to license his picture under the GFDL that's his business. Besides, we now have another picture with a different license. -N 10:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

AGF here.  howcheng  {chat} 18:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Y_Combinator_Logo_400.gif
Creative Commons license, but no indication of this at source website. Videmus Omnia 17:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * See [], last sentence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlbtlbtlb (talk • contribs)
 * See my comment above. Uploader is Trevor Blackwell, founder of Y Combinator. -N 10:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

A "Y" in an orange box is not copyrightable. Tagged PD-font and Trademark.  howcheng  {chat} 18:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Elevation1.jpg
Listed as both copyrighted and GFDL. Videmus Omnia 18:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC) \

Image:CarterF.jpg
I don't know who actually owns the photo, but worldstadiums.com has this same photo at. It's a web-resolution picture (not something likely taken with a digital camera). Big ΔT 19:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:The_Stooges_2007.jpg
Image is the basis for the main image of the band's homepage (http://www.iggypop.com/) and appears in the photos section of their myspace page (http://www.myspace.com/iggyandthestooges). There is no indication in either place that it is released under cc-by-sa-2.0, and even if it was, it does not provide the attribution required by that license. When I first saw this image yesterday, it was licensed as PD-self. Bigr Tex  19:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Jeff.stryker.hisxpress.jpg
Listed as GFDL, but no indication of this at source website. Possibly granted by e-mail? If so, needs to be indicated and forwarded to OTRS. Videmus Omnia 19:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see Wikipedia:Successful requests for permission and, perhaps more importantly, my disputing its applicability. __meco 19:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I will contact the source website, and ask for a better permission. Brianga 20:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Email sent. Will keep everyone posted. Brianga 04:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Tom.chase.hisxpress.jpg has been listed now for the same reason as this image. __meco 19:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * And Image:Will.west.hisxpress.jpg. __meco 08:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, from looking at this list there's a lot more images that will be affected by the outcome of this case. Perhaps it's time to drop the axe if HisXpress hasn't responded yet to Brianga's email? __meco 09:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't think the "to Wikipedia" portion of the email is a factor. A GFDL release is to everyone and irrevocable.  howcheng  {chat} 18:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I'm unsure where the best place to make this comment, but I'll do it here. I have made an inquiry at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems concerning this case and problems I see with the decision made by User:Howcheng. __meco 21:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:26d1ab1b94a18f1b547f33f06a7b3c1e200608170fullcy3.jpg
Licensed as PD-self, but with a fan forum topic listed as the source. No indication that any of the images in that topic (I couldn't find this image) were released from copyright. Bigr Tex  20:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)