Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 July 8



Image:Ballista2.JPG
Copyrighted computer game screenshot, was used to illustrate historical articles, now orphaned, has been tagged PUI since August 2006, but apparently not listed here. — Stephan Schulz 16:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Rational was given on User_talk:Feydey. I'll fix the page. —Andrew Hampe Talk 23:06, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:LollicupBMT.jpg
PD-self license, but is derivative of a copyrighted work (the product package). Videmus Omnia 02:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * So I suppose a picture of a Big Mac or a Quarter Pounder is un-free as well? 69.143.136.139 00:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Miss Russia tatiana kotova.JPG
likely copyvio After Midnight 0001 03:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bandadansur.jpg
Stamps are not GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bandipur_Bazaar.jpg
Images by the Flickr user sourced are All Rights Reserved. Nv8200p talk 04:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bandipur_Reading_Paper.jpg
Images by the Flickr user sourced are All Rights Reserved. Nv8200p talk 04:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bandipur_View_SouthEast.jpg
Images by the Flickr user sourced are All Rights Reserved. Nv8200p talk 04:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bandipur_View.jpg
Images by the Flickr user sourced are All Rights Reserved. Nv8200p talk 04:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Banner01.jpg
No evidence uploader has rights to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Baotu_Spring.jpg
No evidence uploader has rights to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Abhishek.jpg
Claimed as a self-photo, but is suspiciously high quality. Uploader has previously made image uploads with copyright problems — Borisblue 04:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC).

Image:Souness1.jpg
Claimed as a self-photo, but is suspiciously high quality. Uploader has previously made image uploads with copyright problems — Borisblue 04:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC).

Image:KyleWrightPass.jpg
I can't find the exact source after two years, but this is blatantly a news media photo. The uploader has been blocked as a sock of so really it could be speedied as a contribution of a banned user anyway. Big ΔT 04:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Normal anjelicahuston0030.jpg
does not appear to be user created, especially in view of the fact that it is referred to as a screenshot. — Rossrs 08:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sallyoscar.JPG
as above, appears to be a screenshot of the Academy Awards ceremony broadcast rather than a user created image. — Rossrs 09:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jessicalange10.JPG
this was uploaded by the same user as the images Image:Normal anjelicahuston0030.jpg and Image:Sallyoscar.JPG, and although this image looks more candid than the other two, it seems likely that it has also been unintentionally tagged incorrectly — Rossrs 09:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC).

Image:Basilsproutsclose.jpg
There are both "fairusein" and "GFDL" tags on this image from an absentee uploader. I will err on the side of caution and go with this being an unsourced non-free image, Nv8200p talk 13:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BasketWeavingBahrain.jpg
No evidence of permission to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Batchawanabay.jpg
NO evidence the uploader has permission to release the image under the GFDL or that it is freely avaiable as the source is a copyrighted website. Nv8200p talk 13:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BatelcoBuildingManama.jpg
"Courtesy: Bahrain International Circuit" does not grant permission to release under the GFDL. Nedd evidence of specific license release. Nv8200p talk 13:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Correct "poster" tag and FUR added. SkierRMH ( talk ) 23:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Batman_pinball_flyer.jpg
No evidence uploader received permission to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Battery_Cogan.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Battery_Hardman.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Correct "poster" tag''' and FUR added. SkierRMH ( talk ) 23:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Baywatch_flyer.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 14:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bbfield.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 14:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bdummi.gif
No evidence uploader has authority to release images under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 14:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:BeamClayplaque.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 14:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Beer_in_glass_2.jpg
Original version was deleted. Cannot verify it was GFDL. Absent Uploader. Nv8200p talk 15:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Beer7_Tel_Aviv_2007.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Beetle_Cats.jpg
No evidence uploader had authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Begum_akhtar_1.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:TMI.JPG
TV screenshot, self-licensed by uploader pablo ::  ... talk ... 15:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Abdallah El-Yafi and Gamal Abdel Nasser.jpg
Uploader first claimed non-commercial or educational use only then questionable PD-self. — Jusjih 15:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Abdallah el-Yafi.jpg
Uploader first claimed non-commercial or educational use only then questionable GFDL-self. — Jusjih 15:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Negri176.jpg
Possibly unfree, there is a copyright notice here. Image caption says it's from the 20's, may be PD-US or may qualify as fair use. -N 15:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Ernestmartinmurderer.png
See image summary ShakespeareFan00 15:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, it's a fair use image properly tagged as fair use, with a note that a court has ruled that the state of Ohio cannot prohibit fair use of its intellectual property. I see nothing wrong with this image, considering the fact that the subject is now dead and no new free picture could be produced. As well, mug shots may actually be pd-ineligible but the community hasn't been able to reach consensus on that. -N 16:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It does not have a proper fair use rationale, those Ohio legal snippets contradict each other and suggest it can only be used for 'educational and non commercial use' - that isn't allowed in wikipedia, it can only be used as fair use and references to non commercial use should be removed. Bleh999 00:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair use cannot be restricted by the copyright holder! That's why it's fair use! It's an EXEMPTION from copyright. And of course we aren't competing commercially with police agencies for mug shots! -N 10:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * but there are legitimate uses of fair use and uses that are not legitimate fair use. We can use such an image under fair use exceptions of US law without the permission of the copyright holder, but if you put legal quotes in the image as a rationale saying it can be used 'non commercially and for educational use only' that is not fair use but is permission by the copyright owner for a specific application, we do not enter in such contracts on wikipedia according to policy. Bleh999 10:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

--- Kept. Garion96 (talk) 16:08, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I have added an appropriate fair use rationale to the image. -N 22:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Believe.jpg
No evidence this image was released for free use or that uploader has any authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:ApocalypseKilgoreX.jpg
I don't believe that the copyright holder released this image for free use. — Sancho 16:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bennystems_small.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 19:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sherk.JPG
Licensed under GFDL, but the image is taken from a place where only contracted photographers would be allowed. Also, scan lines and artificating suggest it's from an SDTV broadcast. '''east. 718 ''' 20:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Penn.JPG
PD claimed, but the image is taken from a place where only contracted photographers would be allowed. Also, scan lines and artificating suggest it's from an SDTV broadcast. '''east. 718 '''
 * Looks to me more like JPEG artifacts, not scan lines. And, it is indeed possible for a contract photographer to take a picture and release it into the public domain. 69.143.136.139 00:29, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That is true, but evidence of creation is required. Also, the image probably is from a TV broadcast; certain artifacts are indicative of 3:2 pulldown but are pretty hard to find given the overall JPEG artifacting. A contracted photographer can't release an image by the way, as it is a work for hire. east . 718  10:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, as a consultant I can tell you that's not the case. You're obligated to turn over the rights for works provided on-contract. However, works can be created with, e.g., a personal camera, or while on a break, things like that. It's very murky. Evidence of creation isn't required for everything. In fact, above I mentioned the quarter pounder article. In that case, the assumption is made that nobody took that image under contract. It's easy enough to make the same assumption here, given the abysmal quality of the image – or indeed to assume nobody's going to come after it. Either way, I've said my piece. The reason I left was the image nazis (or at least a large part thereof), so I've no interest in squabbling about it. You might consider relaxing a little, however. 69.143.136.139 23:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm certainly no "image nazi"; you'll find I'm one of the most relaxed editors here when it comes to non-free use. The only reason I sent this image to PUI is exactly that&mdash;it's of very poor quality and quite obviously comes from a TV broadcast. east . 718  21:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Standrewfacade.JPG
PD & copyrighted, but no evidence released in the PD. Also, Image:Standrew2.jpg — Garion96 (talk) 21:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC).

Image:Spice Girls Reunion.jpg
Licensed under GFDL, but Fair Use Rational is present. (Worth noting, one reason in the Fair Use Rational is that it was taken with their own camera. — Andrew Hampe Talk 22:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * As far as i know is reuters's, but it's been public to everyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.33.179.212 (talk • contribs)
 * Uploader has been causing problems at Commons over this image as well -N 20:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:5 - Bonez Tour.jpg
Unlikely public domain image. Looks like a professional publicity shot. Summary indicates that it was found on a fansite containing galleries of such images. Kurt Shaped Box 23:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:1 - Promotional Tour 2002.JPG
Unlikely public domain image. Looks like a professional publicity shot. Summary indicates that it was found on a fansite containing galleries of such images. Kurt Shaped Box 23:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:2 - Try To Shut Me Up Tour.JPG
Unlikely public domain image. Looks like a professional publicity shot. Summary indicates that it was found on a fansite containing galleries of such images. Kurt Shaped Box 23:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:3 - Mall Tour.JPG
Unlikely public domain image. Looks like a professional publicity shot. Summary indicates that it was found on a fansite containing galleries of such images. Kurt Shaped Box 23:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:4 - Promotional Tour 2004.JPG
Unlikely public domain image. Looks like a professional publicity shot. Summary indicates that it was found on a fansite containing galleries of such images. Kurt Shaped Box 23:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:6 - Promotional Tour 2007.JPG
Unlikely public domain image. Looks like a professional publicity shot. Summary indicates that it was found on a fansite containing galleries of such images. Kurt Shaped Box 23:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)