Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 November 1

Image:JRHarrison.jpg
says both copyright, used with permission, and PD - what's correct? Calliopejen1 00:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:JNS1.JPG
says pd-self but sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:JNS.JPG
says pd-self, but sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jackbodenhonor.jpg
looks like a scan of a copyrighted news article Calliopejen1 01:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Nope it's a scan from an old American Pigeon Journal (APJ). This now defunct magazine has been out of print for many years. The picture is public domain. Sting_au | Talk 09:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Just because the source is out of print doesn't make it public domain. Mangostar (talk) 00:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, it can't be PD-self, it must be PD-old for example..--OsamaK (talk) 09:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Beatnik.jpg
"with express permission" sounds more like db-i3 than PD-release. Source link,, is now dead, and the archived versions at contain no notice of copyright release. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:VLC Vista.png
I‌ think it's copyrighted screenshot too. OsamaK 03:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the video being played is almost certainly non-free. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Good lord. Well, I hope what I have just done satisfies. -- TV -  VCR   watch  13:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The Vista GUI widgets and window decorations are still technically non-free, though they might be argued to be de minimis. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The screenshot has been changed to address the issue of copyright (whatever video was shown playing in it has been changed to show no video - I would prefer a copyright free clip being shown instead though - for example a shot from Steal_This_Film). Also screenshots are well used on Wikipedia and don't appear to be infringing copyright on all the other instances Monads (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a screenshot of a GPL 2.0 licenced product, I thought screenshots of free software automatically were covered under GPL, (and thus GFDL,) as a derivative work -- RoninBK T C 00:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Kept, uploader has uploaded a fixed version, Thanks  TV  :)--OsamaK 17:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Tagged as reviewed. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Dd NguyenKhanh.jpg
"permission given by http://ngothelinh.150m.com/ for Free License" sounds more like db-i3 than GFDL. No OTRS record of this permission. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jones Green Apple Soda.JPG
Only the copyright status of the Jones Soda label is indicated. There is no indication of the copyright status of the photo itself. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jonesthanksgiving.jpg
Only the copyright status of the Jones Soda label is indicated. There is no indication of the copyright status of the photo itself. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jedinice.JPG
Unclear from the summary if the uploader actually created this image. Rettetast 08:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Stolen from here: . Direct link: Speedy deleted. --Dijxtra 10:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:722966_356x237.jpg
looks like a publicity photo. Uploaders only contribution Rettetast 08:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sorin_C_Bojin.jpg
looks like a puplicity photo Rettetast 09:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:DSCN0732.JPG
The image page needs to feature the "pui" template (not discursive comments by uploader & other users re: my objection in placing the template in the first place). That template should not have been deleted (same objections pertain); the image page itself should not be protected; it needs further work. The image page needs better description, clearer templates, and should be more like Image:Nobel medal dsc06171.jpg (though I still dispute the "public domain in the U.S." template tag there; see Image talk:Nobel medal_dsc06171.jpg and above that sec.). Both of these images have current entry in Media copyright questions. See also Talk:Nobel Prize and Talk:Nobel Prize in Physics, as well as Nobel Prize in Physics, for comparisons. GFDL-compatible licenses do not seem appropriate for either of these images, whose "non-free content" is still disputed. --NYScholar 10:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC) --Updated. --NYScholar 11:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC) [added link to talk page sec. for convenience of others. --NYScholar 01:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)]


 * Not actually tagged. PUI is unlikely to be the right venue in any case. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:President Steamboat.jpg
Image is "Courtesy Gateway Riverboat Cruises" so is not National Park Service US Government Public Domain. — SEWilco 14:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Verified as "Courtesy Gateway Riverboat Cruises", probably not public domain. -kotra 21:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)