Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 November 20



Image:Knot1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of GFDL licensing from the source site. Jusjih (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Birkenheadschool.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of public domain claim per source site. Jusjih (talk) 01:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Blair.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Originally tagged, with explanation "created from public domain aerial photos" but no source for said photos. Previously deleted as per ; image undeleted with explanation "probably from the USGS". Seems just as likely it was taken from Google Maps etc. Gyrofrog (talk) 15:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Short SB5 ETPS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyright does not need to be claimed to exist. Being published does not make it 'public domain'. The copyright in this image likely lies with the Empire Test Pilots School/Qinetiq Ltd. will not expire until 2018. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.136.236 (talk) 17:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:ShadyLaneVideo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F6 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Invalid source, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Not deleted, image now has non-free tags and rationale. Shell babelfish 21:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Vitas in russia 2005.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Unable to verify free status. PD-self claimed, but image is taken from official Vitas website, where it's credited to G. Avraamenko. Official website has no copyright info for images. Muchness (talk) 20:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:William Tomlin 11.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader claims this image is his own, however it appears to be a screenshot, the caption in the article appears to confirm this. anemone I  projectors  22:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:William Tomlin 4.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader claims this image is his own, however it appears to be a screenshot, the caption in the article appears to confirm this. anemone I  projectors  22:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:5698 Thomas Law 03.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Brought to my attention as it was uploaded by the same person as the above two images. It appears to be some sort of publicity image. anemone I  projectors  22:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Northstar boots.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The photographer might have released his rights to the image, but the sculpture is still copyrighted. The web-resolution and inconsistent EXIF data on the uploader's PD-Self tagged images are also enough to justify asking him if he's really the photographer of those images. Gmaxwell (talk) 22:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Please hold off while OTRS ticket is resolved. Although the EXIF information you mention is troubling, and if it does turn out to be not his we should simply delete it because of that.  &rArr;   SWAT Jester    Son of the Defender  23:18, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Horus Jesus.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Listed as GFDL but is a simple merge of two pictures that are unlikely to be the creator's property — Stephen 23:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * It seems to me like might apply here.  It's nothing more than a side-by-side comparison of two 2D works of art that are obviously in the public domain (Image:Christus_Ravenna_Mosaic.jpg and Image:Horus 3.jpg).  I suspect the uploading user either believed that combining two images made it "his" work, or he was just being lazy with the tag.  Someguy1221 (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Uploader has changed to after the notification --Stephen 03:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.