Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 November 23



Image:Karp450.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is claimed to be CC-ASA but there is a copyright symbol on the face of the image itself that is not obviously linked to the uploader &mdash; Dave (Talk | contribs) 01:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This is a commons image. --B (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:AudreyMunsonInspiration.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is a film screenshot and cannot be licensed under the GFDL – Dream out loud (talk) 03:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Some time ago (The date is on the image page, I think) I tracked down the copyright owner of that image and obtained permission to use it.  I probably have the emails that we traded somewhere, but really do not have the interst in finding them.  This was done in 2004 when the copyright templates and general situation was different.  I did the best I could at that time. I find it interesting that all the challenges to copyrighted images that I've posted have come from wikipedians rather than copyright owners.  I posted many, many EP covers, for example, most of which have been removed over the years -  mostly for "esthetic" reasons.  I no longer feel vested in spending the time to do this sort of work when someone else just comes along and removes it.  I feel (opinion) that this image under discussion is both legally, morally and artistically appropriate for the article.  Thanks for alerting me to this discussion. Carptrash (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:DG-6-001LE.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 22:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has rights to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 05:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Thorhild_Widvey.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence this image had bee released as PD Rettetast (talk) 11:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Kristin_Halvorsen.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of PD. OR Rettetast (talk) 11:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Vasile goldis.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged as PD-self but taken from. Muchness (talk) 14:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Locomotive LDE1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged PD-Self, but sourced to. Muchness (talk) 14:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The following images are also tagged PD-Self but sourced to : Image:Locomotive LDH1.jpg, Image:Locomotive LE1.jpg, Image:Vagoane cisterna chimice2.jpg, Image:Vagoane cisterna petrol1.jpg, Image:Vagoane descoperite1.jpg. --Muchness (talk) 14:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:DSC_0056-50.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image of an artist's work. Nv8200p talk 14:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Hotel-intercontinental.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged PD-self but sourced to a blog, Bucarest : la ville contemporaine. Muchness (talk) 15:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The following images are also tagged as PD-self but sourced to the blog: Image:Howard-johnson bucharest.jpg, Image:Charles-de-gaulle-plaza.jpg, Image:Bucharest-financial-plaza.jpg, Image:Millenium-business-center.jpg, Image:Cathedralplaza.jpg. --Muchness (talk) 15:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Manchester big screen.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

It's from BBC (as my understanding), it can't be under CC OsamaK (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * There is nothing to suggest it is owned by the BBC, it is more likely the user took it from the top of the Triangle as that is where the view is from. Please withdraw dipute unless proof can be provided of the copyright of the image as it is part of a current WP:FAC and this serves no purpose except to disrupt to the process. └ and-rew ┘┌ talk ┐ 17:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Nominator notified. Rudget . talk  18:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.