Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 November 24

Image:SHG Full House.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

--Number1spygirl (talk) 12:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Not deleted, image is tagged as a fair use screen shot and is in the deletion queue for lacking a rationale. --B (talk) 01:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Daisuke-moo.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence uploader has rights to release under GFDL. Nv8200p talk 00:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Anderson Oliveira.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged GFDL-self, but sourced to a blog with no image licensing info. Muchness (talk) 00:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Q_ewar_Directors_Julio_Lucy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence upploader has permission to release image as GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Gomes.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

PTSE (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:East Side Access.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 22:05, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No real rationale, just claiming that any image related to subject can be fair use. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:East Side Access2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No real rationale, just claiming that any image related to subject can be fair use. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Being from a confirmed sockpuppet and the rationales being so weak, I've dfu'd these images instead for WP:SPEEDY. Kelvinc 22:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Gemma Atkinson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Promotional image from Ultimo http://www.ultimodirect.com/shop/miracle-plunge-bra-d-g-714?clid=774 PTSE (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:East Side Access3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No real rationale, just claiming that any image related to subject can be fair use and cannot be duplicated, but nothing unique to suggest irreplacability. Kelvinc (talk) 06:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The editing of these East Side Access pictures reminds me of the editing of User:Roadcrusher3--the use of computer-generated pictures and the breaking of the template call. See my comments at Jason McHuff (talk) 05:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Being from a confirmed sockpuppet and the rationales being so weak, I've dfu'd these images instead for WP:SPEEDY. Kelvinc 22:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Animated_Turkey.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The only mention of copyright on the source site is "© R-Network 2002-2007", so while it might be implied that they permit free of charge download and personal use there is no indication that the images are free for any purpose. Also the site most likely does not hold the copyright to most of it's material, there is a whole secion for anime characters and stuff that are clearly just screen captures and watermarked promo stuff, pluss lots of professional photographs with no attribution of any kind. Yeah this type of image get used all over the net, but here on Wikipedia we don't label stuff as free for any purpoose unless we know who the copyright holder is and that they intended that kind of use. Sherool (talk) 10:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Bodystockingsleeveless.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Three images apparently lifted from a lingerie retailer's online catalogue; no licensing information provided. &mdash;83.216.204.224 (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Somali Dervish.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Check also rest of his images: Almost all of them are violations as they describe no information about the copyright status.

No information about the image, very likely a copyright violation. --Pudeo⺮ 16:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Assassin.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Cannot be All Rights Reserved and GFDL. Probable copyright violation. Nv8200p talk 17:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Second Avenue Subway (SAS)construction3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No real rationale, just claiming that any image related to subject can be fair use and cannot be duplicated, but nothing unique to suggest irreplacability (the claim that being from a newspaper is FU is plain out ridiculous). URL suggests NYTimes copyright. Kelvinc (talk) 20:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Being from a confirmed sockpuppet and the rationales being so weak, I've dfu'd these images instead for WP:SPEEDY. Kelvinc 22:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.